• Anahkiasen@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I say it because my neurodivergent ass memory is my mortal enemy and decides on its own what to remember or not so I have about a 60% confidence on any statement unless it’s a special interest.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      this. its like two types of people. I will never say anything is for sure. If I say 99% sure that is about the top for me. I recognize that there could be something untrue somewhere in my statements but I know other folks were if they are over 50% sure they definately know.

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        And then they get mad because you humiliated them in front of all those people, and carry a grudge about it and say you’re vindictive and “have to be right about everything.”

        Not everyone is like that, of course.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          “You were very confident and I doubted my memory. I wanted to make sure I wasn’t spreading misinformation.”

          One of the quickest ways to deflate the person’s argument, especially in a social setting. It makes you look humble and makes them look like an asshole if they keep going at it. If you want to subtley needle then, you can also apologize if they felt attacked by being corrected.

  • lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Sadly, for me in particular, I sort of remember and I’m probably right, but I’m ready to run away just in case it’s otherwise. My politeness comes from allowing others to correct me, which I do. Sometimes. Be honoured.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      There’s a non zero chance I’m in the matrix and nothing has ever really happened. I will never be 100% sure of anything.

      • lath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        I also use it when I do remember the source, but it’s too much work to find it again.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      It is a nice hedge for when you can’t be bothered to spend time looking things up to support a claim and don’t want people asking

    • beastlykings@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      This is me 100%.

      Though I’m probably right, I’m fine with being wrong. I don’t want to spread untruths. I’d rather learn the true thing and try not to forget it.

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        learn the true thing

        Don’t forget some people would rather teach the false thing.

      • Taiatari@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Same here, but I found that most ppl. overhear /do not register that I did in fact say ‘if…’ they go right ahead an presume I said :‘it is this way and I am correct’. Quite frustrating that.

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      When I say it I mean it, like I think I’m right but not sure, so don’t take it as straight fact.

      Not meaningless at all in my opinion

  • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I feel like this is something that women have to do a lot (not that men don’t) to avoid being thought of as overly aggressive. I hate it.

    • atomicorange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      I once had a (male) boss tell me (female) that to be successful as a leader in our engineering industry as a woman, you have to be a bitch. He was trying to encourage me to be less polite and more confident, but he also made it clear exactly what he thought of those confident women. I think he was trying to be a good mentor but it fucked me up, because I don’t consider myself a bitch, nor do I want to be one. It took me a long time to realize he was wrong, and that I can be a kind person and confident at the same time.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        It must be difficult to know what to make of that kind of feedback. Some people value indirectness, others value directness, and many people value both, at different times. And then there’s the sexist aspect of some responders. Sigh.

      • bradboimler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        I know the answer to your problem, do this thing

        If it makes you feel better I wouldn’t be remotely put off by a response like that

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        I wonder if this is gender or industry or country. I’m in government info tech and we are pretty tolerant of single line emails stating an undecorated answer or solution

        Or perhaps we’re not but I don’t hear about it due to being male, tall, and grey haired

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      It is just admitting that you are able to be wrong, because most humans can’t handle someone stating something, being corrected, and then accepting the right answer without an ego based conflict.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      It’s like using “just” in emails. Guys don’t do it, but women are seen as bitchy or bossy if they don’t.

      “I’m just checking in about the progress on [x]”

      Versus

      “I’m checking in about the progress on [x].”

      The latter feels much more direct. Women will tend to use the former while men will tend to use the latter. Because for guys it conveys authority; I’m checking in on this, you should have an update. While for women they need to downplay their authority; I’m looking for an update, but don’t mind me. Because if women stop using “just” they’re suddenly seen as demanding, bossy, too authoritative, etc…

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        I’m a man and I still use “just” because even if a man doesn’t use it I see them as aggressive and dickish. I feel it’s just more polite to use it.

    • CaptainPieces@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Personally this is something I do with my parents because if I make them feel bad for being wrong I’m the bad guy

    • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      That’s exactly why I (a man) do it. Because I’m trying to be polite about you being wrong and before I put your nose in it, I’m giving you a chance to acknowledge your mistake.

      It’s diplomacy, but yeah, apparently some men are still extra salty when the messenger is a woman. Go figure.

      • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Same. I have been working where I work much longer than my boss. I know the relevant requirements better most of the time. I don’t throw that in their face. Plus, even if I’m right, they can (in the moment) pull rank and enforce whatever they want. I remain humble in my assertions and in return they almost never pull rank. It’s a good balance. My boss actually depends on me to know the requirements and be able to tell everyone what they are. Then, they just enforce them. Win-win for me.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    There are subjects in which I have formal training and extensive experience in. Here I speak with authority and don’t use slippery language; I may even cite sources.

    There are other subjects that I read about once probably somewhere on the internet at some point in the last 25 years or so. Here I will phrase it as “If I understand correctly” or I might even pose it as a question inviting others to correct me.

    I went to flight school during the time when we all thought System of a Down had recorded a song about the Legend of Zelda. If you don’t have an internal rating system about how reliably you “know” the things you “know” you’re probably not worth listening to.

    • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      I think a problem might be that even if you have an internal rating system, it’s still a spectrum and the other person doesn’t know what that percentage of confidence you have is. If you’re 95℅ sure, maybe you still want to communicate that it isn’t 100℅ since assuming you’re 100℅ sure might cause problems.

      Things change all the time, even if it’s part of your field of expertise. Today, gorillas are technically monkeys and Pluto isn’t a planet, but lots of people are sure those aren’t true.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      I will use slippery language for every statement unless you are family or you are paying 100$/hr 4 hours minimum. And then I will phrase in terms of “the trade offs and decisions that are available to you and why”

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          That may or may not be the case, it’s true that you get what you pay for but sometimes you also get more than you bargained for. Really, it’s up to you and your risk tolerance level about possibly over paying for advice or risk missing out on a valuable advice. Anyway, I’m not here to tell you what to do, because you’re paying me enough.

    • CH3DD4R_G0B-L1N@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      There are subjects in which I have formal training and extensive experience in.

      Grammar clearly not being one of them.

      I kid. Sorry, I’m a sucker for low hanging fruit.

    • silasmariner@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      Lotta potential positions you could take with regards to that system, y’know. cracks epistemological knuckles, what ya got? How do you decide how much weight to attribute to a fact you heard someone else tell you? Who? In what context? That stuff doesn’t, I believe, have a pithy answer

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I remember stuff quite confidently.

    I always say “if I remember correctly” both as “cover my ass” and also, bait for anyone who subscribes to “alternative facts”.

    I usually won’t bother correcting you if you try to correct me, I’ll just let you be wrong.

  • Beacon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I also do it to hedge, because even when I feel sure about something i acknowledge there’s a tiny chance i could be wrong

  • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I add it because I’m always 99.99% sure I’m right but like I’m not gonna be the asshole confidently spreading misinformation.

    Except for the few times I didn’t add it and ended up being wrong.