• CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean its also the better food, American food is so stuffed with pointless corn syrup that Americans who spend time in Europe consistently lose weight even if they don’t change their eating habbits, the UK is going the same way so fast that I’m turning into a vegetarian because the meat in my price range is genuinely becomming cyberpunk levels of bad (It basically just tastes like starchy mush with no resemblence to meat in flavour or texture at this point)

  • Aeao@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 days ago

    I heard about a study that women who own horses live longer. The comment below was "if you can afford a horse you can probably afford health insurance. It isn’t the horse "

    • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Essentially yes but it’s not the underlying cause, as it wouldn’t also be true in places with free at the point of use healthcare.

      The group “women who own horses” will, on average, be wealthier of course. However, it will contain an abnormally large group of people who can afford not to work.

      Wealth is the biggest indicator of life expectancy. Adjusting for healthcare costs, the change happens when people earn enough passively to not work or significantly reduce their hours to a very small number.

      Imo, the answer is “we’re all forced to work ourselves into early graves, unless you can afford to live off of other people working themselves into an early grave for you.”

    • meliaesc@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      By aspiring to own a horse or live by the water or whatever, you can accidentally afford healthcare too!

  • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    3 days ago

    What’s more depressing than American healthcare?

    Canadian conservatives replacing theirs with the American system without a fight.

    • Wisely@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      When I last visited Canada a group of old men were talking at the Canadian Tire about how long it takes to see a doctor. Were saying they need to start making people pay like they do in the States.

      Don’t fall for that propaganda. We have both long waits and pay a ton of money in the US. It can be both. I’ve had bills up to $118,000 and it can take me a year to see a specialist. I can’t find a primary care doctor and it takes several months to get in with a temporary nurse practitioner instead.

        • Tyfud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Most likely the insurance covered a huge chunk of that.

          It’s a long story, but the TL;DR; of American healthcare is:

          Healthcare providers over-inflate their costs and over-charge by orders of magnitude to insurance agencies. Why? It’s because insurance agencies have whole teams and teams and teams and teams and teams (80% of insurance companies cost is administrative groups that just do this) of people that negotiate/argue that down to a reasonable amount. This means they pay a fraction of that initial bill, but they don’t show that in the printout, instead they negotiate only “their part” of the bill, and send the rest they didn’t negotiate down to the enrollee to cover up to their yearly maximum.

          This is why you see bills for $100K+ and your amount owed is roughly $2-3K with insurance “paying” the rest.

        • Wisely@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I didn’t. I put some on credit card that was required up front in hospital and the rest went into debt collection while I fought the insurance company for 2 years. Eventually I ended up paying about $12,000 I think.

          But the credit cards interest was more and I have been in severe debt the past decade since. All my money goes towards debt payments and bills.

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s pathetic. We are willing choosing to let it go, despite being such a huge advantage of being Canadian

      • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Wait are you guys going down the shitter too? Illegally migrating to canada has always been my backup plan

        • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          3 days ago

          Oh yeah, we are. Pierre says privatization is cool, and like morons, the majority of Canada believes that this rendition of trickle down economics won’t line the pockets of the rich

        • _____@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 days ago

          the entire conservative agenda is to dismantle universal healthcare from the inside to prove that “it doesn’t work, we should privatize it”

    • PlaidBaron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I hear this a lot but where is it happening? Definitely not in the discussion in NS.

      Dont get me wrong, fuck the PCs but I havent seen any real evidence of replacing our public medical system.

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s the provinces with an outrageously wealthy upper class. BC, Calgary Alberta, and Ontario are chock full of rich conservatives that want to replicate the American system in Canada so that they can rival their American peers.

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Heaven forbid life expectancy factors be TWO things!

    Obviously easy access to healthcare AND a non corn syrup based diet are important factors in determining longevity.

    Edit: Does anyone know what this category of logical fallacy is called? Basically the fallacy where a person incorrectly tries to attribute an outcome to a single cause.

    • actually@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      In East Texas the further one is away from Houston the less their life expectancy. We all eat the same stuff, I think. The difference maxes out to 5 years average less per person, near Louisiana, but if you look at the actuary stats it’s a straight line correlation between medical center distance and how long we live, on average

      This honestly is repeated for many states in the USA. The metro areas have same life expectancies as Europe and Japan, but it’s balanced out by rural lack of access and fewer preventative cares.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 days ago

        It is a lot easier to survive a heart attack and stroke if you can reach a hospital or comparable medical service in a reasonable amount of time.

        • actually@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yes, that too, but the way it was explained to me is that high blood pressure, diabetes and easy to diagnose diseases which make up the majority. All solved by regular checkups

      • firadin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Look up food deserts and reconsider whether urban and rural citizens in America have the same diet.

        • actually@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Food deserts do exist in many places, but majority of people in my area need vehicle access to get any groceries, or work. One usually does not walk down to the local dollar general.

          And with vehicles come access to real grocery stores

          • firadin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Food deserts in the south are worse than just “need to drive to a grocery store.” Often the only nearby (short drive) is a store akin to Dollar General with very little or no fresh produce. If the closest place you can get decent quality fruit and veggies is an hour drive, you’re going to end up on a diet of corn syrup.

            • actually@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              And that is definitely an issue .

              Here is another take, I think the mortality patterns would have differences per county based on how many towns and food stores there are. But I don’t see it, for example Lufkin would have a higher life expectancy because so much of that county is a metro area, but it does not stand out against the other counties

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Reductionism? Oversimplification?

      Einstein supposedly said “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler”

    • azuth@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yes but life expectancy has been rising in those countries despite worse diets and obesity rising. So it seems access to healthcare is a stronger factor.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s both? Mediterranean and Japanese diet are said to be the healthiest diet. There is a reason why Mediterranean and Japanese are the longest lived in comparison to everyone. If anyone isn’t convinced, compare with the Polynesians. They also eat lots of fish and coconuts like the Japanese, but they are some of the most obese in the world due to their wide adoption of ultra processed and fast foods.

    • kiwifoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Turns out it is all bullshit anyway. The Mediterranean and Japanese diet fads were based off reported life expectancy figures. It turns out that the longer life expectancy is due to poor government records and widespread pension fraud in these areas. A Nobel prize was awarded for uncovering these issues. A number of other studies that purported that olive oil was key to a healthy heart were later retracted for bad science.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I heard this about the Japanese super centenarians but I have never heard it about France. Interesting.

        There is also the whole “red wine is good for your health” bullshit from France too…

        Not being obese, sedentary and full of processed food and soda is the key IMO, plus healthcare obviously.

    • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      And apparently westernized diets are catching up with the Japanese, so much so that there are cases of people in their 90s still going strong, but taking care of their decrepit children in their 70s.

    • exasperation@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s thousands of tiny little things, pushing and pulling lifespans up and down.

      As the screenshot notes, it’s both diet and access to healthcare.

      It’s also other lifestyle factors, like amount of walking or driving, amount of alcohol consumed, tobacco use, etc.

      It’s social and economic factors, like income, education levels, employment status, type of job, disability status, marital status, number of close friends.

      It’s mental health issues, and related statistics like suicide rates, substance abuse rates, etc.

      There are environmental factors, like environmental exposure to certain hazards or pollution, sunlight exposure, altitude, certain illnesses isolated to certain climates, maybe things like localized microbiomes (although those are also correlated with foods eaten and things like that).

      There are also genetic factors for individual families or potentially ethnic groups.

      And perhaps the one that can’t be ignored entirely is just plain old recordkeeping. Some places have high rates of people living past 100, but don’t seem to have much in the way of a lifestyle or environmental explanation, and may more accurately trace back to unreliable birth records 80+ years ago such that people might be mistakenly reported as living longer than they actually did.

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s good that the reply with someone repeating the joke was included in the Facebook screenshot and it’s even better that this Twitter screenshot includes someone else repeating the joke

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    Also when every lead poisoned hillbilly and their toddlers don’t have unfettered access to firearms, that probably brings down life expectancy a little bit.

    And I’m sure the massive over reliance on cars, the form of transit with the highest mortality rate, and freeway doesn’t help.

    Nor the fact that every portion of food is enough to feed a small village for a week and is at least 10% corn syrup by mass.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ha ha yeah I don’t pay anything.

      Have to pay upfront though before I get it all back (you don’t have to if you are poor enough), that dental work made a hole in my account for two weeks… but getting 800€ back is sweet too.

  • lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    Tbf diet is a factor, too. Not living in a food desert is a huge plus.

    But seriously, the Mediterranean Diet is also a thing discussed in Europe while the north is wealthier and has better social security. Still, no one recommends the Scandinavian Diet or living without sunlight in winter. I still value the post as a meme. I don’t want to be the actually guy but just provide some context.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Move more. Eat better. Have better access to medical care and no stigma in using it.

    There was also an article a while back that most “blue zones” (I think they were called) are probably BS with inconsistent and bad measurement.

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Avg life expectancy at birth in the US is 78.5 years, and the highest avg life expectancy in the EU is Switzerland at 83.4 years, which is a difference of 4.9 years, not 15. Metabolic disorders driven by diet are absolutely the biggest contributor to mortality in the US. You should see the disgusting shit these people are willing to put in their bodies over and over. A lot of people just don’t remember not feeling shitty and are completely unaware their diet contributes to feeling bad.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      If you are comparing a single country in Europe to the US the comparison should be at the state level.

      Mississippi is the lowest state and close to 70 years in 2020. So if the comparison is the lowest US state to highest European state then you get a gap that is close to 15 depending on what year’s data is being compared.

      A better comparison would be all of the US to all of Europe since we vary so much from state to state just like Europe varies from country to country.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        It would make more sense to compare the highest states/countries to each other and the lowest states/countries to each other, but even then you could keep comparing smaller regions and still just not come up with what you’re looking for. In the US, there’s way more poverty and people who subsist on absolute junk food 24/7. On the other hand, the life expectancy in NYC is over 85, and in my county in Texas it’s 82. There are lots of factors that go into this, and the meme above misses the mark

  • Mayor Poopington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Infant mortality is a big reason our life expectancy is so low. Which is connected to how hard it is to see a doctor for lower income people.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The sociopath capitalists want us poories to be jealous of their concierge medicine based longevity to feel superior, but jokes on them, they made society so shitty and desperate that we see premature death as peace at last!

    Checkmate, owner class!

  • Shatur@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Always wanted to ask, what are the countries with accessible medicine? Could anyone recommend?