Can’t wait for Android 15 that looks almost exactly like Android 12

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        Pixels get 7 yearss of updates. Most other androids are trash, including Samsung imo

          • Zetta@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            I use GrapheneOS, which is the best security focused ROM out there. It only supports Pixels.

            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              22 days ago

              I personally would avoid Graphene as they have had a lot of controversies. Use what ever works for you though. For me I don’t really care to have Graphene OS and I don’t like Pixels.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Y’all don’t understand semantic versioning.

    Google does a major release pretty much yearly.

    Major releases are for breaking changes.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      That’s exactly what we’re complaning about. Major release cycle used to be much longer. Now they have this need to break things all the time. I hate the new bubble settings UI, and that everything keeps getting worse to use instead of better.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        Then…don’t upgrade?

        I’m sorry I don’t see what the problem is here. This is a typical release schedule.

        iOS has the same schedule (major release yearly). At least Google supports and patches for over 3 years. Apple is supporting 17 and 18 and that’s it. Android is still patching 12-15.

        Mobile hardware is probably the fastest developing
        corner of consumer electronics…between processors, screens, and battery technology. Of course software will have to change fast to keep up.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Why does software have to change to keep up with any of those? Old software can run on new hardware just fine.

          • DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            Only if the old software happens to have drivers compatible with the new hardware, which it almost certainly doesn’t.

            • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              23 days ago

              If only the people pushing the new software had complete control over their old software, the new software, and the new hardware. Oh well. Clearly there’s no way to preserve backwards compatibility here, it’s not like Google controls every detail of their manufacturing lineup.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Not upgrading is not an option if you don’t want your highly connecting device to remain secure.

  • MightyCuriosity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    This is creepy. I was just thinking this an hour ago. Android used to have incremental updates (8.1.2 amirite) but now theybjust brand it as a new version when there’s like one or two new “features” no one will use.

  • bitwolf@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Android looks good. Why do they have the change the look again when not nearly every app is even using Material You?

    I’d rather performance, power, and more capabilities like desktop mode.