• DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Science Journalists; Neil Degrasse Tyson claims dead pixels may actually be Mercury sized planets!

  • Alenalda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Ironically mercury while being the closest planet to the sun, isn’t the hottest planet in the solar system. Venus takes that title because of its atmosphere holding so much co2. Im sure its fine were putting so much of it in our atmosphere.

    • Vinny_93@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yeah I prefer summer to winter so if we get summer and super summer now I would enjoy that until I’m dead and after that, why should I care?

      /s just in case.

        • Vinny_93@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          The beach is great. The only issue is that on days worth going, lots of other folks will be there.

          We heat up the planet by 4 or 5 degrees, it’s gonna get much less crowded. It’ll be like a perfect, permanent vacation.

  • Juice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I guess because of perspective, Mercury being millions of miles closer to the camera than it is to the sun, the actual proportions would have the planet being much smaller by comparison

    • nexguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Mercury’s apparent size in the sky when close to us is about twice the size as when mercury is in the other side of the sun from us. So mercury would appear about 75% the size it is in this photo of it were next to the sun (so about the same distance away as the sun is).

      • crank0271@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Wool socks are the best and I won’t be entertaining assertions to the contrary. Wool is temperature regulating, not just super thick and hot, so there are wool socks you can wear in the summer. They also don’t hold odor (bacteria) as much.

        • foofiepie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          You are spot on. Add to that, merino wool with an antibacterial coating for sports use eg skiing. Wool socks are the only kind I don’t wear holes through in a matter of months.

        • Prehensile_cloaca @lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Wool is also more durable than cotton, so buying wool, or wool blend socks makes logical sense for something that takes a lot of wear and tear, ie covering your feet.

        • azi@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          And they stay insulating even if soaked all the way through. Perfect for hiking or trudging through snow

  • aname@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Mercury is like 30-50 sun’s diameters away from the sun. This perspective makes it look like it’s almost touching.

    Size scale matches though

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah this perspective is weird. It makes it look like the sun takes up 90% of the sky on mercury. That can’t be right though.

  • JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    How is the next transit of Venus not until 2117? That blows my socks’ mind. Seems like that should be happening very regularly.

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s probably more about how often it’s visible in your part of the world than it happening at all if I had to guess.

    • A_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Same reasons for any eclipses :
      .1- plane of orbits (the one for Venus and the one for the Earth) do not exactly coincide and
      .2- because distances between objects are much larger than objects, including size of the sun.

  • JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Trying to wrap my head around how incromprehensively large even just our sun is always makes me feel dizzy.

    We are not even a pale blue dot to most of the universe, and when we disappear nothing will know or remember us.

    • SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      My fav sun fact is that it burns 400 million tons of hydrogen each second, and will be doing that for billions of years. That’s 400 million tons of the lightest possible element there is. Just absolutely insane how gigantic the mass of the sun is.

      • Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        My fav is just that the sun is, all by itself, 99% of the total mass of our solar system. Most of the rest of that 1% is Jupiter.

        • addie@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          You’re understating it a bit there - the sun is 99.86% of the mass of the solar system by itself. To the nearest whole percent, the solar system consists of 100% “the sun”. To the nearest 0.1%, it’s 99.9% the sun and 0.1% Jupiter.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_mass

  • thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    This reminds me of that part of that space opera I read where there was a nomadic colony on mercury which needed to always be moving at exactly the right speed to stay on the dark side of the terminator.

    • BalderSion@real.lemmy.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Wow. I was in middle school and had to do a creative writing assignment, and I wrote a science fiction short story set in a colony on that boundary of Mercury. I thought Mercury was tidal locked. I was praised for my creativity.

      I was today years old when I found that Mercury is not tidal locked.

      • Lyrl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        The 3:2 resonance Klear references is considered a type of tidal locking.

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Same here. I was so going to ackchyually that guy, but I did a quick check before and turns out there is a day/night cycle.

        Apparently one Mercury day takes exactly two Mercury years due to some fuckery involving “3:2 spin-orbit resonance” which is something I’m too drunk to comprehend right now.

        Gonna be an interesting wikipedia binge at work tomorrow tho

    • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      That was in the Red / Green / Blue mars trilogy, one of my favorites. Though I think I’ve seen the concept in other works as well.

      Basically the temp difference between day / night caused contraction of the rail tracks, pushing the whole city forward so it was always just ahead of dawn.

      • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        The nomadic colony got expanded on in KSR’s novel 2312. I don’t actually remember much about it in the Mars Trilogy.

        But I’ve seen the concept before in an old EU Star Wars novel, one of the Solo books maybe, where Lando was operating something similar as his new venture.

        And before that maybe mentioned by Sagan. And before that…

          • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Adjacent, probably. Very similar, and seems to purposefully be set a hundred years after Blue Mars ends (2212).

            But it starts and ends on Mercury after a voyage through the solar system, not spending much story time on Mars.