• TedZanzibar@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I had no idea that people struggled with this so much and have come up with such crazy (to me) ways of figuring it out.

    Most of the world, if asked to write down numbers 1-100 on a line, would do so left to right. The < and > symbols are arrows pointing left and right. To the left the numbers decrease (less than) and to the right the numbers increase (greater than).

    All this stuff about crocodiles and ducks seems like such a bizarre way to remember it!

    • dnick@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yes, but that’s because that’s the way your mind interpreted it, it could have just as easily thought that the arrow (little side) should point in the forward direction from left to right, so ‘point to the bigger number’.

      Basically two completely unrelated things both make sense to you in the same direction, and that happened to be the direction that the the people picking the symbols also picked. If they had simply picked the opposite direction, all the people who currently struggle might find out perfectly natural and be confused as to why ‘you’ have such a problem understanding it.

    • Umbrias@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      you say that but your method is only just as intuitive lol, wild how many methods work.

    • Antiproton@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Here’s a wild thought: inequalities are not always written with the lower number on the left… or there wouldn’t be a need for two symbols.

    • lefixxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      A mnemonic device is a mnemonic device.

      I think about how the symbols have two sides, one is a point (small side) and the other is wide (big side)

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I think about it the same way I think about + and -. I don’t think at all. I just know.

      Maybe it’s because I’m a programmer and I encounter comparators more than addition and subtraction.

    • F04118F@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Ehh

      • They tend to get the sign wrong, or straight up not know it and end every sentence with “or the other way around”
      • their room is a mess
      • they have a soldering iron and a box full of Arduinos/Rasberry Pis/ESPs
      • they have weird hobbies, (or none, because their work is sufficiently shaped like weird hobbies/obsessions)
      • they regularly say “local minimum” and “higher order effects”

      What did I forget?

  • kamills@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    I’m a mechanical engineer, and I often have to do a double thumbs up with my hands like b_d. It’s the only way I can remember what comes first in the alphabet. In danish you spell boat båd, and if you mess up the order the b and d will be on the outside of the boat and drown, like dåb. Still works 20 years later

    • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Do you have dyslexia or something like that by chance? I don’t think I’ve met anyone who gets confused between b and d. (No offense, I’m just intrigued)

      • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Am librarian and can confirm: we all do this. It mostly comes up when shelving or retrieving books.

  • callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Indicative of the fact this approach is counterintuitive to our thinking, but we’re too stupid to adopt a new way to show it.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      It’s not. This is schools failing worldwide to teach math in an adequate form.

  • kubica@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    It’s a thing that I’ve always thought that people over-complicate. It’s just there, the small side with the small number the big side with the big number…

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      “The entirety of the small number constitutes a relatively smaller portion of the big number. Thus, the open side of > points to the smaller number to indicate that it’s a magnified view within the larger number.”

      I hope this helps overcomplicate things for you. We must all return to crocodile.

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Crocodile? Are you guys from Florida? In Europe we learned it as duck beak, it just makes much more sense, where are the teeth? Nowhere it’s not an alligator mouth it’s a beak

        • will_a113@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Nono, we don’t do math in Florida anymore. Also we’d be more likely to use “alligator” (tho we have plenty of both)

        • SOB_Van_Owen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          In the pre-digital age when most of this was pencil markings, it was not uncommon to see someone had drawn the teeth in.

          • loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            Duck, crocodile, they’re both archosaurs. Which means if it’s either, they should have a premaxillar fenestra on the lower jaw, but I’m not seeing any. Clearly, this must be a possum.

    • Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Whoever my first teacher who taught me this did over complicate it, because when I wrapped my brain around bigger side equals bigger number and smaller side equals smaller (much later than I should have) it was a revelation and also seemed ridiculous it didn’t start out that simple.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      For a while, I’ve seen “<” and “>” as a slanted “=”, which is to say, these numbers are not equal, and the larger side is the larger number and the smaller side is the smaller number.

      Works for me, IDK.

    • abcd@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I agree. It’s totally simple and people overcomplicate.

      BTW one nice thing about German is, that you can even use the same logic for Boolean operators: The AND operator ∧ is called UND being the shorter word (when you put the name at the top). The OR operator ∨ is called ODER being the longer word.

      You can use the same logic in English if you Place AND/OR at the bottom instead 😁

      • Hoimo@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I always remember those as “knife” and “cup”, but you have to know that I use my cups the wrong way around.
        When you have two things AB on a table and you come in with a knife or cup (NB: upside down) from above, the knife will separate them “A or B” while the cup will catch them together like a pair of angry wasps “A and B”.

      • affiliate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        i also think the “etymology” of the boolean symbols is very helpful in remembering which is which. in lattice theory, their use was inspired by similar notation in set theory. so, AB is like AB, while AB is like AB.

        generally, AB is “the smallest thing that’s greater than or equal to both A and B”, while AB is “the biggest thing that’s less than or equal to both A and B”. similarly to how AB is “the smallest set that contains both A and B”, while AB is “the largest set that’s contained in both A and B”. you can also take things a step further by saying that in the context of sets, AB means AB. doing this means that A ∨ B = A ∪ B, while A ∧ B = A ∩ B. and from this perspective, the “sharp-edged” symbols (<, , ) are just a generalization of their “curvy” counterparts (, , ).

        in the context of boolean algebra, you can set False < True, which at first may seem a bit arbitrary, but it agrees with the convention the that False = 0 and True = 1, and it also makes AB and AB have the same meanings as described above.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          for some reason to remember ∩ and ∪ when I first learned it in school I visualized a mirrored symbol on top. the ∩ looked like a X which represented an intersection, while ∪ looked like an O which represented a whole. for English ∪ already looks like a U which can be thought of as short for union. that would’ve been easier.

          • affiliate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            ooh the mirror trick is quite handy. i don’t think i’ve heard that one before. i’ll keep that one in my back pocket in case i ever need it some day. i can’t remember exactly how i learned what they meant, but i think it was probably u for union and n for ntersection.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        for English the AND sign looks like an A anyway. if you remember that for AND the OR is just the opposite.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Are you a programmer? I’ve never struggled with them either, but I’ve had a lot of exposure to them due to programming since I was like 11

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Somehow, people don’t teach this interpretation at schools. (Despite it being so obvious that it was clearly the original reasoning behind the symbols.) And then nobody talks about the fact that nobody knows how to read them, forever.

      Mine had something about crossing a line through the symbol and seeing if it makes a 4 or a 7. Honestly, “the crocodile wants to eat the big number” is still better than this.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        This is only tangentially related but I’ve noticed an increase in people saying backslash instead of slash when speaking an internet address aloud. I think many more people struggle with / vs \ than > vs <.

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Just to note, backslash or forward slash refers to the side the slash falls to.

          • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            I remember it because I’m old and was into computers before the internet. Local drive was backslash "" as a directory separator and online it was slash “/”.

  • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    The teacher who first taught me told me “Pac Man wants to get the most points” and that stuck with me

    • FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Thanks I finally understood this thread, kept thinking people were viewing the crocodile/duck/whatever from above

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    “Points at the smaller thing”

    Every time I watch a student stall out on inequalities I ask “it’s the crocodile isn’t it?”. Without fail, they’ve got confused by it and as soon as they hear “points at the smaller thing” they have no issues.

    • PwnTra1n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      yeah its literally a graph. the bigger side is the bigger number. the smaller, surprise, smaller number.

  • zante@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    According the old joke, and with no offence to scholars, the answer is :

    “They’ll fucking tell you”

  • siipale@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    I still sometimes think of pillars of one building when I think of concept of “tomorrow” because seeing those pillars was supposedly the first time in my childhood when I heard about “tomorrow”.