• HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They’re heroes until they ask for help on their medical bills. After that they’re just freeloading degenerates.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    161
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Never forget this terrible 9/11 with 3000 victims… in Chile 1973 U.S.-backed coup against leftist President Salvador Allende, democratic elected, to create an bloody dictatorship with the US friendly Pinochet. Never forget.

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    174
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The ultimate cause was US “national interests,” which have only ever been the interests of the the oligarchs who run the country. They have always run the country. “National security” does not secure anyone’s safety; it secures the profits of imperialists. The Department of Homeland Security isn’t protecting us, it is cranking up the police state to protect the capitalist class from the working class revolting against grinding neoliberalism.

    • Darohan@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      84
      ·
      2 days ago

      The boomerangs subtly implying the real truth of the matter - that the Australians were behind it all along! No wonder “the Bush” was involved!

    • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I can’t like this post or the pic enough. Hard af. I’ve been shouting this from the rooftops since 2001.

        • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          But for real though, Osama benefitted from Western Imperialism and was directly motivated by religious scripture, not his socioeconomic position.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            Why did he constantly talk about how the attacks were politically motivated? What is the basis for claiming that he was motivated by religion?

          • davel@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Who said anything about his socioeconomic position? He was in fact wildly rich. He was a product of US interventionism. He had been a CIA asset for years. He didn’t just wake up one day and decide that Allah wanted him to blow up buildings on the other side of the world, for no reasons connected to US foreign policy.

            6 December 1993: Anti-Soviet warrior puts his army on the road to peace

            FAIR: Forgotten Coverage of Afghan ‘Freedom Fighters’

            But the U.S. government and the American press have not always opposed Afghan extremists. During the 1980s, the Mujahiddin guerrilla groups battling Soviet occupation had key features in common with the Taliban. In many ways, the Mujahiddin groups acted as an incubator for the later rise of the Taliban in the 1990s.

            Despite CIA denials of any direct Agency support for Bin Laden’s activities, a considerable body of circumstantial evidence suggests the contrary. During the 1980s, Bin Laden’s activities in Afghanistan closely paralleled those of the CIA. Bin Laden held accounts in the Bank for Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), the bank the CIA used to finance its own covert actions. Bin Laden worked especially closely with Hekmatyar—the CIA’s favored Mujahiddin commander. In 1989, the U.S. shipped high-powered sniper rifles to a Mujahiddin faction that included bin Laden, according to a former bin Laden aide.

              • AnneVolin@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                If Islamism is the ultimate cause of 9/11 then Islamism must be the ultimate cause of October 7th which is literally the same story and the same propagandistic cover in the West.

                I think a lot of people don’t understand geopolitics in the sense that it’s not a functional system of yeses and noes, it’s a system of maybes based on maybes.

                The ultimate cause of October 7th is that the geopolitical factors especially the intentions of the US were to remove Palestinian question from the heart of the security architecture of the Middle East. October 7th was effective because it closed off the possibility of the Abraham Accords and a Middle Eastern security architecture based on a Saudi/Israeli/Egyptian agreement which was tacitly against Iran and the Palestinians.

                Likewise the ultimate cause of 9/11 was based on geopolitical factors. The first Al-Queda fatwas said

                It should not be hidden from you that the people of Islam had suffered from aggression, iniquity and injustice imposed on them by the Zionist-Crusaders alliance and their collaborators; to the extent that the Muslims blood became the cheapest and their wealth as loot in the hands of the enemies. Their blood was spilled in Palestine and Iraq. The horrifying pictures of the massacre of Qana, in Lebanon are still fresh in our memory. Massacres in Tajakestan, Burma, Cashmere, Assam, Philippine, Fatani, Ogadin, Somalia, Erithria, Chechnia and in Bosnia-Herzegovina took place, massacres that send shivers in the body and shake the conscience.

                They’re literally referencing Chechnia and Tajikistan here. It’s a complex geopolitical statement. This is a group that has fought the USSR, who were not Zionist-Crusaders in their opinion. The references to Chechnia and Tajikistan were directly based on the calamity that liberalization of the USSR brought upon Muslims, that the US helped lead into those positions. Much like the Chicago boys in Russia.

                The second said

                First, for over seven years the United States has been occupying the lands of Islam in the holiest of places, the Arabian Peninsula, plundering its riches, dictating to its rulers, humiliating its people, terrorizing its neighbors, and turning its bases in the Peninsula into a spearhead through which to fight the neighboring Muslim peoples.

                If some people have in the past argued about the fact of the occupation, all the people of the Peninsula have now acknowledged it. The best proof of this is the Americans’ continuing aggression against the Iraqi people using the Peninsula as a staging post, even though all its rulers are against their territories being used to that end, but they are helpless.

                Second, despite the great devastation inflicted on the Iraqi people by the crusader-Zionist alliance, and despite the huge number of those killed, which has exceeded 1 million… despite all this, the Americans are once against trying to repeat the horrific massacres, as though they are not content with the protracted blockade imposed after the ferocious war or the fragmentation and devastation.

                So here they come to annihilate what is left of this people and to humiliate their Muslim neighbors. Third, if the Americans’ aims behind these wars are religious and economic, the aim is also to serve the Jews’ petty state and divert attention from its occupation of Jerusalem and murder of Muslims there. The best proof of this is their eagerness to destroy Iraq, the strongest neighboring Arab state, and their endeavor to fragment all the states of the region such as Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Sudan into paper statelets and through their disunion and weakness to guarantee Israel’s survival and the continuation of the brutal crusade occupation of the Peninsula.

                Bin Laden himself has pointed to the 1982 invasion of Lebanon:

                The events that affected my soul in a direct way started in 1982 when America permitted the Israelis to invade Lebanon and the American Sixth Fleet helped them in that. This bombardment began and many were killed and injured and others were terrorised and displaced.

                I couldn’t forget those moving scenes, blood and severed limbs, women and children sprawled everywhere. Houses were destroyed along with their occupants, high rises demolished over their residents, rockets raining down on our home without mercy…As I looked at those demolished towers in Lebanon, it entered my mind that we should punish the oppressor in kind and that we should destroy towers in America so that they taste some of what we tasted and so that they be deterred from killing our women and children.

                And that day, it was confirmed to me that oppression and the intentional killing of innocent women and children is a deliberate American policy. Destruction is freedom and democracy, while resistance is terrorism and intolerance.[32]

                The idea that 9/11 was the invention of Osama Bin Laden getting high on Islam in a Mosque while chanting and then telling his evil followers that god has told him to destroy America is a false American invention seeking to discredit the actual geopolitical arguments that underpinned the attacks, and transform them into merely cultural grievances that escalated into a war which is easy to sell to a moronic liberal audience all to ready to consume propaganda because the Soviet Union fell and they needed a new bad guy that hated them for their freedom.

                The fact that this isn’t common information despite being in multiple reputable places online speaks to the propagandized nature of the discussion of this event in America.

                This wasn’t about globohomo, women’s rights, American cultural permissiveness, or any other bromides you can easily fit into “religious extremism” narratives. It was simply about the imperialism of the American Empire.

                • shezznazz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  My friend, how are you so knowledgeable, I’m an avid fan of history and geopolitics. Do did you learn from books, articles, papers or just alot of digging and curiosity?

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m more offended by the shit spelling of “heroes”.

    And I was nearby NYC on that day and watched the second tower fall (largely as a shape in the smoke and particulate cloud).

    • BluesF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Actually they misspelled ‘ware’, they’re talking about who the nation’s biggest hero is afraid of.

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Because the best way to stop US imperialism is to drag them into and/or start a war

      Citations Needed podcast: Episode 13: The Always Stumbling US Empire “Stumbling”, “sliding”, “drawn into” war––the media frequently assumes the US is bumbling its way around the world. The idea that the United States operates in “good faith” is taken for granted for most of the American press while war is always portrayed as something that happens to the US, not something it seeks out.

      I am not even anti US imperialism

      Well see, there’s your problem.

  • Anna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Of course it wasn’t the hijackers the real hero’s heroes were the CIA Agents who planted the bombs that actually took down the twin towers.😂😂😂😂😂😂