Thats because its…
HYDRODYNAMICALLY DESIGNEDCyclist hate this not because of the danger it pose, but because it’s not aero.
Lobsters go the other way though…
Hey now - I ain’t judging nobody.
Or a cow.
Wait til you see a spherical cow.
How do you have access to a picture of me??
Wait till YOU see the biblically accurate cow.
Man. That looks like one happy cow enjoying that breeze. So serene. Very jealous.
Interestingly, Jeep Wranglers are like the stereotypical hairdresser’s car in Europe so this kinda makes sense
I’m gonna need to put oversized tires, a jack, and a custom air intake on it for all my trips to Walmart.
On the lobster?
This guy gets it
Wouldn’t a lobster technically be waterodynamic? Or eauodynamic? What’s Latin for water…?
eauodynamic is so fun to pronounce.
Hydrodynamic
Ugh, of course! Thank you! So dumb of me. Hydrohomies and all. Appreciate it.
have you ever submerged a jeep? i have. doesn’t go very fast.
Then why do they have those mufflers that stick above the car?
A Jeep is also less aerodynamic than a brick. Having a Jeep as a daily driver fucking sucks for gas mileage.
Well… duh? A fairer comparison would be the cow vs jeep. A sea creature vs something designed for land isn’t that great of a comparison because water is thick enough that you’re going to need some kind of aerodynamic (fluodynamic?) adaptation to survive. Air is thin enough that evolution can sacrifice some aerodynamics for other traits.
So is a cow more aerodynamic than a Jeep? Edit: Nevermind, it got kind of answered in another thread.
At the speed cars move at, air behaves much like water. They’re both fluids. The faster you move the more resistance it has, but also the more dense the fluid is the more resistance it has. Moving quickly through the air is similar to moving slowly through water.
I think it would be hydrodynamic and screw evolution I want my beef to be as aerodynamic as an F1.
There’s a Jordan Peterson joke in here somewhere
