• megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Definitely, just to prevent it from being normalized. Just like crypto, flying cars, psychics, MLM businesses, this shit will fade in to the into the domain of low skill grifters.

  • Spiderwort@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe all digital content just shouldn’t be trusted. It’s like some kind of demon-realm or something. Navigable by the wise but for common fools like you and I, perilous. Full of illusion.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Personally, I don’t really care.

    I do enjoy some types of AI content, I do not enjoy others. Same as any other type of content. So that tag would be useless for my personal preferences.

    Anyway nsfw tag is made not for moral reasons, but to avoid those images showing when you are in an environment that’s not proper for them (basically so it doesn’t look like you are watching porn at work), this makes no sense for AI content, So I don’t see the point besides some kind of persecution driven by a particular ideology. So I don’t support it.

  • renzev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    A lot of people seem to think that all ai art is low effort garbage, which is just not true. There can be a lot of skill put into crafting the correct prompt to get the image you want from an image generator, not to mention the technical know-how of setting it up locally. The “ai art is not art” argument to me doesn’t sound any more substantiated than “electronic musicians aren’t musicians, go learn a real instrument” or “photographers aren’t really artists, all they do is push a button”. But regardless, I agree that we need good tagging, or as @ThatWeirdGuy1001 said, different communities. Even though the output looks similar, actually drawing things and wrangling prompts are two completely different skillsets, and the way we engage with the artistic product of those skills is completely different. You wouldn’t submit a photo you took to a watercolor painting contest. Same with ai art and non-ai art.

    Anyway, just thought i’d share my opinion as an ai non-hater.

    • Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      For art to be art you need space to express yourself through individual choices:

      • play an original song on a real instrument, and you have the entire artistic spectrum to yourself
      • if you make the music for it out of individual pieces, you narrow that range. The sounds are not yours, only their composition and words
      • when you record a cover of a rap song over some elses beat, you further narrow it down to your performance only. Its still artistic expression, but to a much less degree than an original song

      In a prompt generated image, the image itself is not your expression. The prompt is, but comparing the amount of choices you need to make with a painting over a prompt, its just so… less art?

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        In digital art, the image itself is not your expression. The idea is, but comparing the choice of shaders you use with brush strokes done with real paint, where you can see and feel the emotions the artist wanted to express with their physical brush, it’s just so… less art?

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sure. Only problem is, it’s a people issue. Some people making ai generated content may be honest and willing to abide to such rule, but most are proud to not even read the rules and just blast shitty slop left and right. For this second category of people, when you point it to them, a very small percentage of them goes “oh, sorry”. The vast majority just keep posting until blocked.

    Granted, this experience mostly stems from every media posting sites out there, so it may be a bit biased…

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think ai posts should only be posted on ai communities so I can block them all at the same time.

    Seriously. Even for memes and funny stuff ai needs to fuck off.

    And the fact that everyone even calls it ai when it’s not even close to being a vi is infuriating.

  • Lurker@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It is available on R34, Hentai and Porn Website.

    Truly we are just improving our tech to goon. LOL

    • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Tech progress has always been driven by humanity’s desire to either kill or fuck someone. I, for one, prefer horny-based progress. Make love, not war, and all that.

      • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        we need more innovation in the intersection of killing and fucking, perhaps by designing more realistic fuck-dolls that can have explosives rigged to them to trap and kill soldiers.

  • Spiderwort@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Lots of stuff should be tagged but isn’t.

    Bad faith arguments. Rhetoric. Information gotten from dubious sources. Metaphors that might be taken literally… Lots of stuff.

    Yes, tags would be a great addition to common language. I’d put them right up there with emojis

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    And it should be tagged at every level: metadata, watermark, poster, website. Redundancies will make it harder to use AI for lying.

    Internet-wide, culture-wide, society-wide.

  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I am in complete agreement with this. While you can currently tell what’s AI it won’t be long before we’re scratching our heads wondering which way is up and which way is down. Hell, I saw an AI generated video of a cat cooking food. It looked real sortve.