Why go to argue with tankies if you don’t like that?

I feel like this may be your fault. Two does not argue if one does not want to.

Engage in other kind of conversations and you’ll be fine.

If you are bad here because of that you’ll be bad everywhere. Anywhere you go you’ll probably find someone to argue in an unpleasant manner.

Because here it’s not normal to leave food at work.

That’s why I can be so chill at it.

I legitimately though Oregon was a State, I didn’t know it was also a city.

From my country I’m going to be generous and say Barcelona. Second biggest city here. I doubt next bigger cities are universally known.

Strictly for leg warming purposes.

The egg shall never be broken.

That’s a lot of words for just saying “I love being a racist”.

You hate somebody because of their skin color equals being racist, simple as that.

Wtf is the wolf gonna do? Starve to death?

A life of experience being different to people surrounding is my source.

I suppose you can check mental health statistics on people who is different to the group they are living with and see how they are doing.

Also literally most countries legislation legislates against different people with plenty population support.

People is awful.

In many countries most normal people will harass, imprison or kill people based on sexual preference or gender identity.

Just normal people. Not members of any extremist group. Just the guy who is selling groceries or the gal buying them. Most people on this world hate anyone who is different to them.

Nah.

A life of experience tells me most people is awful, and will have zero regards on making your life miserable for whatever reason they see fit.

People is generally bad, they just are like that. My simple existence is hated and ilegal in most of the word. Most of people in this planet wish me death without even knowing me just because how I am.

Are you saying that because I do not punch holes in walls I am not a man?

You can say that to my programmer socks if you dare.

Do you have the calculations for thar 15%? I’d love to fact check it.

Quick search didn’t found me that report from the iae. You should probably pass me a link so I can fact check it too.

My country is not the USA, we do not have those ridiculous parking places that you guys have. Still renewables takes a ridiculous amount of space. I shall now as the land where I grew up is totally changed due wind power installations. And we are at 50% renewable generation. I fear to think what would become of this land if it was a 100%

I really think that the sweet spot would be about 30-40 nuclear and 70-60 renewables.

You really need to stop following political dogmas, and start thinking.

Fact: that is a fake statement.

Nuclear is not renewables competition.

Nuclear provides a base line energy production.

Both renewables and fossils produce a variable production line.

So within a rational production scheme the choice is nuclear+renewables or fossils+renewables. As renewables by themselves cannot work. Because there is months over the year when it’s not sunny, not rainy and not windy enough, what do we do for those months? We close humanity during those months because some political dogma says so?

Fact: renewables take more land, that could be used for other purposes.

Fact: renewables by themselves cannot, and I mean CANNOT, be used alone. Unless you are willing to have a ridiculous over-provision. They depend on weather and have massive seasonal divergences. You need a base line power production to have a rational generation scheme.

Fact: nuclear have a higher cap for total production than renewables. As humanity needs more and more and more energy renewables (even destroying all our usable land) won’t be enough.

Fact: no everyone that doesn’t share your opinion is an “astrosuftist lobby” some of us can also think by ourselves. And some of us can ever think above the dogma of our political school of choice.

Probably some filter would be needed. Like a list of curated instances.

Imagine if the geographically closest is the Furry instance.

It is. Both lemmy and Mastodon.

I cannot use Reddit or Twitter anymore.

Run, the butlerian jihad is already going your way.

I talked in other comments about the legislative implications. But here I would like to give a more personal one.

For instance, I would love to have the answer for myself. Because I have asked myself plenty of times “Am I a woman?”, and that leads to de subsequent question “What it means to be a Woman?”, “What I want to be is a Woman or is anything else?”. I know that only I can answer that question. But I want to know why I have to make that question to myself. Why society considers “being a Woman” something? Because that question didn’t came out of nowhere. It came because I, as a person who lives in a society with other people, see people who calls themselves man, woman or other things. And while trying to decide what I want to be, or what I already am, need to take what other people are into consideration.

Idk, if I’m explaining myself. I’ll give a dumb example: Maybe I want to be an Astronaut, but before becoming an Astronaut I need to know what an Astronaut is. Because Astronaut is a profession in our society, and it can be defined. In this context is easy, because I would love to be an Astronaut because I would love to go to space. But, if I love to be a Woman, why is it? What is the “going to space” of being a woman?

I agree to an extend.

I would love to live in a word where all of that does not matter.

But for instance, imagine if we stop taking race into account in the USA (not American but I’m soaked in American culture). How would people know and being able to prove that some race is being discriminated against if the people does not have a definition on some people being part of one or other race.

I despise racial classification. Seems wrong, it works wrong as races are all mixed. But it can work against racism.

For instance, in my country, racial classification is ilegal. There cannot exist any registry on anyones race whatsoever. So black people here does not have statistical data to prove they are being discriminated against. They have a harder time fighting against racism somehow because their race is not allow to be recorded anywhere.

So I don’t really know if, same as gender, I want to know people’s race or not. Feels wrong, but also useful to fight against discrimination.

Nah. That’s just sex.

But there’s been long proved that what we call gender is not 100% defined by sex.

For instance, our traditional gendered bathrooms. The concept does not work if we just take sex into account. As the reasons we have for segregating bathrooms in genders does just not work if people have a different presentation, external sexual characteristics or behavior, that it is traditionally assumed for one sex or the other.

To put intro crude words. Women that would like to have a women exclusive bathroom would really not be happy if someone walks into that externally looks and behaves, and even have the sexual characteristics of what they perceive as a man. It would not matter if that person would have XX instead of XY.

I literally never said anything against non binary, but ok.

I’m just explaining the legislation you asked me to explain.

Legislation on my country does not take non-binary as an option. So I didn’t talk about it. We could have talked about it if you asked about that, as I have lots to say as an non-binary person that really does not fit within my country own legislation on gender.

I feel like you are not really reading me. And I’m feeling more hostility towards my person that I want to feel. So I’m out.

Have a good day.