• Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    It’s a service offered in exchange for currency. No one is forcing anyone to request food delivery service over Uber or whatever. It’s pure and simple convenience

    The other is a state service, which might surprise some but manages quite a lot of citizens private information. Certainly nothing as banal as food

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      If there was a service like this, I’d probably buy there every day. I can plan 1-2 days ahead what I’d like to eat, but more is harder. This would be perfect.

  • Cid Vicious@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Er do people actually pay that high of fees for Uber eats? Maybe in NYC or something? I don’t really use it if I can help it but I’ve never seen fees that high.

    • lobut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      I’ve had high fees but things are hidden, like, increased prices, tips, fees and stuff? I got my license last year so now I can drive on my own to get stuff but being in the burbs without transport in these poorly designed towns blows.

  • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    I think that if food delivery was treated how my last postal package was treated, then all food would be arriving as a soup, or maybe as a goulash.

  • Omgboom@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Don’t worry, they are already trying to get rid of the USPS so we can be charged ridiculous amounts for mail delivery.

      • Omgboom@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        A lot of USPS offices are in prime locations in many cities. The real estate alone is worth hundreds of billions, at least.

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      See the giant bag? He’s got multiple orders in it.

      Not as efficient as driving to every mailbox in a row, to be sure.

      But it also doesn’t cost Uber probably more than 25% of what they charge for an order, to pay the delivery driver.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        A lot of it is about latency too. You’re paying to have someone go get it right now and take it to you right now. Post services pick up stuff daily and get it there over the course of a week or so depending on where exactly it’s going. If you were paying someone to come to you, pick it up, drive it straight to where it’s going, well, it’d be faster, but cost a ton more.

    • big_slap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      yes! it is a SERVICE Americans already pay for in taxes, the need to make a profit on it makes no sense.

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 days ago

            Even worse, it was made “unprofitable” by being required to have a ridiculously high standard of pension coverage, which I believe just ended or ends soon.

              • nomy@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                19 days ago

                Things are fucked from the top down. It’s by design, It’s a long listen but worth checking out How Conservatism Won by Robert Evans. He lays out in a clear concise way “how a consortium of rich failsons got together to fund a network of right wing think tanks and shift American culture in a fun new direction. (note: it was not actually fun at all).” They’ve been very successful and those think tanks are now pipelines used to funnel ideological purists into powerful positions like our current Supreme Court.

                It’s not even a conspiracy, it’s all easily verifiable. These people do not share our American values. They do not value freedoms (speech, press, religion, etc) the same way that many of us do. They want a return to the gilded age with them as the robber barons and landed gentry and everyone else as a permanent, toiling underclass.

        • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          I’d be very fine with it being tax funded instead of being funded by stamps and parcel metering. We might have much less shit mail as a result. It was an actual part of this government, not a corporation like now, before 1970, when the Reorg Act went into effect. Look before 1970 then USPS workers were not allowed to collectively bargain but that still could have been achieved with the a different outcome in 1970.

          I would be very fine with tax funding because as a service the work they do facilitates other sectors’ viabilities. There might also be more accountability to help the workers.