• randomname01@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s fair, and not an unreasonable choice. What I can’t get over is people acting like that’s the only reasonable choice, and that people who have children are idiots.

      Just look around in this thread and you’ll see some smug ass attitudes. It kind of reminds me of those 14 year old kids who feel immensely smart because they’re atheist, you know?

              • naught@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                The only way to experience suffering is to be alive. The only way to be born is without consent

                • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I really appreciate this point of view. I don’t strongly find myself on either side of the isle here, but I think you are making stronger points than those supporting the mainstream opinion that procreation is essential and important.

                  The argument against you seems to be “but there have been worse times to have kids, and people still had them.” That is emphatically not a good argument.

                  • naught@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I think I have a fairly cynical view that reproduction is primarily a selfish act based solely on our biological drive to continue our species. I’ve pondered for a long time, and I fail to see a more logical conclusion than that.

                    Life is tough and there are no guarantees. Rolling the dice by having a kid seems like a messed up thing to do imo.

                    That said, I would adopt a child or children. That’s a better way to ensure you are putting kindness and hope into the world where it’s needed, rather than creating another vessel for pain from whole cloth.

                • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  So? The only way to contribute to community is to be alive. The only way to feel joy is to be alive.

                  Consent doesn’t make sense for a nonexistant being.

                  • naught@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Is the joy worth the pain? What if they don’t want to contribute to a community? Can you guarantee the joy will outweigh the pain? What gives you the right to will another being into existence?

                    If the being will become conscious and self aware, why doesn’t their consent matter?

                  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    What if you bring a child into the world that’s born with a major, incurable defect?

                    Life is not always full of joy, in fact, for many it’s devoid of it. I think really good points are being made here against children.

                    I don’t believe it’s necessarily immoral to have kids, but I DO think it’s a serious grey area. It’s emphatically not the positive action society makes it out to be.