BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 months agoAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square95fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square95fedilink
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoMy point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
minus-squareretrieval4558@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoAnd how does that relate to angels?
My point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
And how does that relate to angels?