• Dave@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I thought it was free as in speech not free as in beer? So if it costs a beer then isn’t it still free (as in speech)? Or is this a OSI vs FSF difference?

    • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      According to the FSF, it’s only free if you tell people what they can do with it, but only very specific things

    • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You’re allowed to charge before you give access to the software, but then can’t restrict the people you give it to giving it to more people. The beer licence sounds like those people would be on the hook for beer, too.

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I was thinking the same thing, does anyone have any context as to why the Beer license is not considered free? If I’m to guess it probably has something to do with copyleft-restrictions (or lack thereof).