• stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Are they really safer in an earthquake though? Those poles could fall over and people could get caught under the cables, worst case while they’re still under high voltage…

    • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Japan is slowly burying all their overhead lines into the sidewalks. A lot of urban streets look so much nicer now than they did 10 years ago.

      It’s probably no worse in an earthquake than the water mains, which would inherently be a lot more rigid than cables with intentional slack built into every segment.

      • Farid@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Afaik, the problem with buried cables is that in case of a flood or tsunami they might break, get exposed and electrocute someone.

        • kn33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Is that less likely to happen if the pole is knocked down instead of the line dug up?