This has to be against some kind of law right?

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Don’t worry, once they have your credit card number they’ll track you even more. At best you’ll get a £‎2.35 cheque from a class action lawsuit in seven years, assuming they ever even get caught.

  • Dave.@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Not really, it’s just phrased differently to the usual signup pitch, they’re putting in a middle ground between full “premium” subscribers (whatever that is) and public access with tracking and ad metrics.

    Companies need revenue to operate. They get that revenue from advertising data and selling ad slots, or subscriptions. Whether they actually cease all tracking and ad metrics when you subscribe is something I’d doubt though, and that could be a case for the legal system if they didn’t do what they claim.

    Personally, this behaviour is the point where I would not consider the site to be valuable enough to bother with.

  • zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I mean, if you don’t want to participate in the advertisement based monetization model, which you shouldn’t, then the alternative to it is a subscription model.

    these sites aren’t free. we have the right to block advertising content and trackers on our browsers but that doesn’t mean we have the right to block advertising while retaining no payment access.

  • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This has to be against some kind of law right?

    Only in the EU.

    Anyways I think that “pay or consent” model isn’t that bad. You either pay with your data or your money. Seems fine to me though pay only would be better. Everyone is used to getting everything online for free. It has to change now imo. The internet isn’t a bunch of hobby forum projects anymore. The price of running a popular website is big and idk if privacy-respecting ads can give enough profit at this point.

    • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Nederlands
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      It is bad. Companies could just have some fucking standards.

      The issue is profit-motivated companies existing in the first place.

      Rather, they should be self-led, and motivated towards the best labour environment as according to their workers. That means their workers feeling accepted, heard and listened to, being able to not only live but also thrive. And all that, while still making the organisation more efficient.