Primarily lemmy.world

Some wild comments on /politics receiving upvotes there. People rebuking them get their comments removed and/or banned for ‘trolling’.

When one visit that place they would think Donald Trump is the current president who is personally strangling every child in Gaza.

People are actively censoring and denying any responsibility from the Democrats regarding the genocide in Gaza.

People are utter the words “Kamala was not perfect” while she is an active participant in a genocide.

It is not “Israel can do nothing wrong because history”. Democrats are the main responsible party. Seemingly they can do no wrong because lesser evil.

Have you ever watched one of the dystopian Biden state department briefings? It is lie after lie after lie.

So apologizing and supporting war crimes is fine as long as it is not communism?

In that case the term Tankie could not be applied to China as the original meaning of the word Tankies could only apply to the Soviet Union.

What I have always understood to be the implication is “people justifying and usually denying war crimes from a government or group which aligns with their political ideology”.

Most often those people do not care about the war crimes. They think a government and/or government ideology is awesome and therefore will excuse any war crimes because it is for the greater good/lesser evil.

Try saying Joe Biden is committing genocide on lemmy.world and you will find a plethora of apologists.

Russia does bomb regularly bomb infrastructure such as energy plants. But Russia is not mass bombing schools, hospitals and refugee camps. Every time they do it it is front page news because 2 people died. Meanwhile Israel bombs a school killing 20 people every single day.

If Russia did what America and Israel are doing in Gaza, the front page of newspapers would be filled with sob stories and gore. And Hamas would be praised as brave resistance fighters against the modern Nazis.

That is true. What the west is doing in Palestine is worse.

Your definition conveniently exempted America and countries such as Germany or the UK.

And if someone supports the American government which is committing a genocide in Gaza right now?

Every time an event reminds us nukes exist.

Unlikely.

It did. But it is pretty safe to assume these ladies did not give consent to be used in a training data set.

Trump has plenty of establishment picks lined up as well.

We had the same fearmongering in 2016. Trump will do some dumb stuff Reagan style but he will not end the world.

You are not understanding the argument.

Let’s say two people are regularly having sex with consent. And man already agrees with her on the issues listed above.

Then OOP pops up and says she should not have sex with him to get her rights back.

Explain to me how not having sex with the man will get her rights back? He already supports them.

Slay the Spire is a card based video game.

FN key on quadruple duty

Sure thing. But that is not what OP was insinuating with his original argument.

In my opinion, talking about women ‘withholding’ sex as a ‘punishment’ implies a certain level of expectation or entitlement, like men are entitled to have sex with women

No they are not entitled. But the poster specifically instructs people to withhold sex. Even if the woman wants to have sex. This could make sense if the woman was having sex with someone who opposes the ownership of their bodies. But if the man already holds their point of view, what is the point? For who are they not having sex? What is being achieved?

Unless you put them in the dishwasher

But this is about instructing women to withhold sex from men as a means to achieve their societal goals.

This does not make sense because It is counterproductive to punish people who already agree with your point of view.