• Argonne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Interesting how it’s ok to shit on technology helping disabled people as long as it’s being developed by a bad dude. If you hack a neurolink you should be charged with attempted manslaughter

    • 0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure everyone in this thread agrees that hacking a neuralink is bad. they’re saying it’s made by Tesla so they don’t trust it out of fear if being hacked and that that is a bad thing. not sure where you disagree with these people.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Not trusting the provider of that tech is a damn good reason to be skeptical of something a person (disabled or otherwise) puts in their brain.

      It doesn’t have to be a hack, it could also just be incompetence. And judging by Tesla’s software track record, I’m not terribly confident in the overall safety of that device.

      • Argonne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah I would never put something like that in my head but it’s obvious it’s targeting disabled people first that don’t have much of a choice right now.