FauxPseudo @lemmy.worldM to Heathcliff@lemmy.worldEnglish · 26 days agoSunday Editionlemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1233arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up1228arrow-down1external-linkSunday Editionlemmy.worldFauxPseudo @lemmy.worldM to Heathcliff@lemmy.worldEnglish · 26 days agomessage-square21fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarepimento64@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·24 days ago@lawrence@lemmy.world explain yourself
minus-squareFauxPseudo @lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·24 days agoHe doesn’t need to explain himself. His groups his rules. Though I definitely recommend they get a second moderator because they are way too slow to respond to things if it took months to decide my posts were spam.
minus-squarepimento64@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·24 days agoPeople always have a moral obligation to explain themselves when they do something boneheaded, the letter of the law is meaningless.
minus-squarelawrence@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·22 days agoI’m open to dialogue. What would you like to know?
minus-squarepimento64@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·22 days agoThe reason behind rigidly enforcing the letter of a rule with no regard for its intent and no room for contextual interpretation
minus-squarelawrence@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·22 days agoWell, I don’t think I’m enforcing rules that much, but I guess it’s a matter of opinion. Maybe you are right.
minus-squareUltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·24 days ago @lemmy.world Well there’s your problem.
minus-squarenomous@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·24 days agoWow an .ml user not rambling about neoliberals or genocide, that might be a first.
@lawrence@lemmy.world explain yourself
He doesn’t need to explain himself. His groups his rules. Though I definitely recommend they get a second moderator because they are way too slow to respond to things if it took months to decide my posts were spam.
People always have a moral obligation to explain themselves when they do something boneheaded, the letter of the law is meaningless.
I’m open to dialogue. What would you like to know?
The reason behind rigidly enforcing the letter of a rule with no regard for its intent and no room for contextual interpretation
Well, I don’t think I’m enforcing rules that much, but I guess it’s a matter of opinion. Maybe you are right.
Well there’s your problem.
Wow an .ml user not rambling about neoliberals or genocide, that might be a first.