• Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    […] psychedelics […]

    I’m glad that it seems like the war on drugs is showing cracks. I completely support a move to legalize psychedelics.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        The carrot got dangled in front of the US population for decades and now it’s going to be handed out by the guy holding a knife in his other hand.

    • dolle@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yes, but it shouldn’t be legalized for the wrong reasons. We used to justify legalization using arguments about personal freedom for recreational use and pushing for more rigorous research into the therapeutic use cases. Now its popularity in the population is just used to push a pseudo-scientific and anti-science agenda.

      • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yes, but it shouldn’t be legalized for the wrong reasons.

        This is kind of an interesting thought, imo. If one agrees with the resultant policy, does the rationale used to get there matter? Perhaps it does in principle, but I wonder if it matters in practice. The end result is the same.

        • dolle@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          If the end result is that psychedelics get used as an excuse to take power away from the FDA, then everybody’s safety gets compromised in all areas of healthcare.

        • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          It does not matter morally, but does rhetorically and politically. The result of neglecting the latter is your rhetoric can be abused, see OP

        • Gorillazrule@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I think the implications here is that the reasons it gets legalized can have an impact on the specifics of the policy. Which would mean that they wouldn’t agree with the policy beyond the legalization itself.

          • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            I think the implications here is that the reasons it gets legalized can have an impact on the specifics of the policy.

            Could you elaborate on what you mean?

            • Gorillazrule@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              If the brain worms tell RFK Jr. That psychedelics are actually a cancer cure, then legislation could be put forth to legalize psychedelics. But rather than allowing recreational use, or using them for a medical purpose based on scientific fact such as use in conjunction with therapy to treat depression, it could be legalized as prescribed medication for cancer. This has the drawbacks of not allowing access to people that could actually benefit from it, as well as now being used as a snake oil cure for something completely unrelated that will prevent people from getting other more effective treatment.

      • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I mean there’s already quite some research with psychedelics showing positive results. Expecting RFK to act on facts and science is wishful thinking. We can just be thankful that his twisted mind aligns with science at least in this position.

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    True story, I went to my doctor about losing some weight as I was close to getting diabetes. For some reason, my doctor loudly proclaimed “Here is a prescription for some meds” while handing me the prescription.

    It wasn’t a prescription for meds. My doctor wrote “Due to Big Pharma and the FDA listening in, I have to prescribed various meds. You really should eat healthy diet that has a healthy amount of calories made up of vegetables and fruit. I needed get exercise and should spend time outside to help everything.”

    Big Pharma is everywhere! /s

  • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    […] ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine […]

    I’ll be honest, I don’t really understand this one. I’d guess that this is likely some hold over grudge from COVID, but I don’t really understand why it’s still a concern to get, presumably, more open access to those drugs. Aren’t we long past that conversation? Feels like beating a dead horse.

  • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    […] raw milk […]

    I’d support this so long as the manufacturers of said raw milk could be held to account for harm caused to a consumer who purchased it under the belief that it was safe — likely, this would also mean that, if it isn’t safe, the product containing raw milk must otherwise display explicit warnings. I think a person should be allowed to take take their own risks.

    • auzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      And parents are held responsible if they give it to kids

      Insurance should also not need to cover sickness caused by it

      • Oneser@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Insurance should cover everyone for everything and should remain affordable for all.

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            What is it with this americans aversion for raw milk, it’s not like you’ll fall down dead if you drink it.

            Do you also burn your salmon and cook your meat?

            In france there are lots of cheese (no really?) and many are forbidden for import to the USA because of stuff like raw milk. Guess that’s why we have the watch coming by getting all the dead babies every tuesday.

            Maybe I’m missing something, please do enlighten me!

          • Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            I also think insurance shouldn’t cover cancer treatment for smokers. Or diabetes treatment for overweight people. Or broken bones for skiers. Or literally anything for anyone who has ever done anything bad for them. /s

            • auzy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              Why shouldn’t they be able to sue cigarette companies or companies releasing unsafe products?

              Why should my insurance be higher whilst cigarette companies are benefiting off their shit marketing

          • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            What if a child were given raw milk by their parents? Should a child be forced to pay for their parents’ decisions, potentially with their life?

            • auzy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              Look up. That’s why I said parents should be held responsible for serving it to kids

  • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Speaking of raw milk, bird flu has just been disovered in it. Buckle up, the next pandemic is coming. Maybe it will go down in history as the MAGA flu. Or Trumps.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Ok, but have you had raw milk Camembert? That’s probably the one thing from the list where you guys should be more lax.

      • neograymatter@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Raw milk for cheese isn’t quite as big of deal as enthusiasts make it out to be. It’s more the homogenization process that destroys milk for cheese than pasteurization. I’ve had alot of success mixing pasteurized skim milk and pasteurized heavy Cream to the ratio I want to make various cheeses. Using Homogenized milk though nearly always failed or gave extremely low yields for me though.

      • SpaceScotsman@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        In fairness, cheese from france is probably safer raw because they don’t have as many superfarms that are as prone to spreading diseases like bird flu

        • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          There’s also the fact that they take steps to hinder bad bacteria. While nurturing the good bacteria that makes their cheese. It’s not like they just throw raw milk into a vat and pull out cheese.

  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    127TB of data. That’s almost exactly 20 LTO-6 tapes. Good for 30 years when you’ll need to transfer them to something better.

    It’ll cost you less than $300 and it’ll all fit into a shoebox.

    Become an archivist. The future depends on it.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Apparently now conservatism is now just constantly relitigating every minor perceived slight.

    For the most part, liberals have moved past the fact that these assholes held the country hostage and killed a million people throwing their tantrum.

    Meanwhile, conservatives are like “we haven’t forgotten that you made fun of us for the horse dewormer thing.”

      • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yup none of these people in Trump’s purview are actively trying to conserve the rate of change.

        They should not be labeled conservative by anyone any longer.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Disinformation coming out of the FDA is a real issue though, it’s just that RFK isn’t exactly the person we should want trying to fix it. His list covers the entire spread from significant real issues to batshit crazy conspiracy theory, leaning heavily towards the latter.

      It’s notable that the areas in most need of reform were all broken by conservative politicians.

    • auzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah. They were pretty adamant lefties were easily triggered a few years ago

      Now they believe lefties are destroying the environment, and are having a temper tantrum over a lie as stupid as people eating pets told by a guy who lies about everything

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s okay I’m going to be eating popcorn in Chicago well Florida gets drowned by climate change. And I seriously can’t wait for that day.

        • syreus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          In all likelihood you will be too busy with the flooding, the heatwave, or the tornados.

          People forget climate change is going to affect nearly every corner of society. There will be very little safe haven and overcrowding in those spared the most.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    You know those shows that’s have a futuristic dystopian society with a bunch of people on drugs?

    Looks like we are right on schedule.

    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      thank you alduous huxley for the warning. maybe with the next rise of fascism we’ll be better equipped to listen to the story tellers warning us about the dangers we’re in