• Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I ended up paying for it because, frankly, expecting Youtube to be completely free and fighting how it could be paid for is kinda crazy. We’re just used to it being free but running Youtube is expensive. I watch hours of Youtube nearly every day and don’t use Crunchyroll nearly as much so why am I ok paying for that but not Youtube?

    Yes, if they do actually start pushing ads then I’m going to wonder what the hell I’m paying for but for the time being I’m ok with paying for a service. I only started paying for it recently, to be fair, but I get it.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Give an inch, they take a mile

      Instead of trying to make money, they should be looking at how to operate without it

      Peertube is an example of figuring this out

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 hours ago

        How to operate without money? Hosting countless hours of high-quality video on demand and streaming it to your computer at highspeed? Are you high?

        I had never heard of Peertube before your comment and it sounds great! It also puts a lot on the content creator, though, and regardless of whether Youtube should follow that model or not how would you expect them to make that change? Just suddenly tell every creator that they must start self-hosting? Genius, that’ll go over so well!

        Peertube themselves are saying that they don’t want to replace Youtube, simply to offer alternatives and choice(which I’m cool with).

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 hours ago

          The transition would be saving videos users watch on their devices not just creators

          However it’s just one path, if Google’s engineers find a better solution then they can do that.

    • FelixCress@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      It depends how many hours per month you use it I guess.

      I am fine paying for Netflix (it is quite cheap here as well) which I watch probably at least 20-30 hours per month but not for youtube which I use for the music maybe an hour per week or less.

      YouTube frequency of commercials is unacceptable. If they were to play a commercial every half an hour or so, I would say it is too often but I would understand it.

      They don’t, they try to play a commercial every other song start, so every 7-10 minutes. They are taking a piss.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I don’t get any commercials now and I use it for all kinds of stuff from educational videos to hours and hours of things like D&D streams. It’s all worth it.

        You pay nothing for it and complain about commercials. I don’t want to go shilling for corporations but whining about Youtube paying the bills is just sad, bud.

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 hours ago

            You responded to my comment about being ok with paying to not get ads by saying that one ad every thirty minutes would be too much for this service you just expect to get for free. It’s not a necessary utility, deal with it.

            No amount of reading comprehension on my end will make up for the lack of it on yours.

      • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        At the end of the day, Google is just going to double dip and take your money, and still sell your data.

        They are, first and foremost, an ad company. Their money maker is the data they get from you; your viewing habits and whatever they can scrape from your computer.