cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/20368770

It’s easy to understand if you realize that America is essentially a corporation rather than a country, and that country is only representing its shareholders.

In case you’re confused - if you’re not rich and powerful, you’re not a shareholder. You’re an employee or a commodity or an expense, and you exist to enrich the shareholder class.

  • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    America had a moment in the 60s and 70s where real change might have been possible. Then Reagan took over in the 80s and selfishness and greed somehow became virtues.

    They instilled a sense that helping others makes you dumb and gullible. Strong, smart people get theirs and fuck everyone else.

    People who need help are just taking your money to buy drugs and can easily get a job and become middle class instantaneously.

    Then a few decades later, the middle class disappeared, and everyone became poor and struggling. Corporate profits keep breaking records, though. Economic inequality in America has surpassed pre-Revolution France. Every billionaire is Louis XIV-level rich and indulgent.

    • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Honestly, it’s incredibly naive to think that America’s issues started with Reagan. The McCarthy witch hunts against communism happened in the 1950s. They targeted education institutions, as well as people that believed in democratic socialism. It stopped a generation from coming up through college and having those values instilled. It was that generation that passed reforms like universal healthcare in other western countries. Reagan was just a product of that system, he wasn’t the root cause.

  • DarkShaggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yep truth…one of the only candidates I ever gave serious money to. His platform was basically “Hey let’s catch up to the rest of the 1st world nations shall we?”…

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Isn’t it kind of dumb to say that the shit giant media corporations report is somehow worthy of criticism of the US Government?

    The state doesn’t run the media in the USA, lmao.

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Isn’t it kind of dumb to say that this post is only criticizing the government when it says nothing of the sort?

      State controlled media isn’t the only way a society can be corrupt, lmao.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It seems like grasping at straws to say the post title and description below the image are referring to a larger collective of people and explicitly not the state institutions, but in both cases you’d be a nihilistic moron for ignoring the nuanced sociopolitical landscape.

        Problem with these messages is they blame the solutions for all their problems. They dont want to fix things. They want a reason to talk shit and encourage violence and destruction.

  • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The VP debate tonight had commercial breaks. Just a friendly reminder for everyone that regardless of the party, it is the almighty dollar that is in charge.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I agree with your sentiment.

      Commercial breaks allow for the stylists and makeup artists to touch up their candidate mid debate. I won’t even imply that commercial breaks weren’t invented because of capitalism and the need to monetize everything, it seems that there were commercial/sponsorship breaks in the earliest of radio programs.

      I am saying that they continue because, for live events in particular, it allows the crew to do their jobs and refresh the makeup of their actor for 30 seconds at a time.

      I suppose you could have some other sort of break that is an exposé of feel good news, or puppies and kittens, but I don’t think that is fundamentally different than using the time to display advertisements. The content of those advertisements can be debated ad infinatum, since even in a fully democratic communist world, advertisements still need to exist.

      • Stefen Auris@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        How about instead of a commercial break it’s a fact check break where they go over the most glaring of lies given by the candidates