• Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    0·
    1 hour ago

    You’re all making fun of it but this new style did exactly what it intended to do. Everyone is talking about them now.

  • Aksamit@slrpnk.net
    0·
    2 hours ago

    Wow, they really took their logo from sexy, fast and expensive looking, to looking like an over priced soft drink?

    That’s impressive, haha.

  • max_dryzen@mander.xyz
    0·
    4 hours ago

    GUys I’m from 2040 2035, here’s Microsoft’s logo

    MS corporate comms army did a sik job getting across those inscrutable monolith vibes, I bet when it launched they all clapped (even though clapping is in performance reviews)

    BONUS: heres Amazon, Faceberg and Nvideo too (yay diversity)

    spoiler

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    0·
    7 hours ago

    I would have failed every design class I took in college if I submitted that. Why such wide kerning? Why lower case but upper G? Why so round? Why so completely unreadable at a distance because of micro serifs? There isn’t one good design element in this.

    • Asidonhopo@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      5 hours ago

      I think they want people to focus on the “agua” and the j and r are just little accents on it like its word art rather than a logo. Like, I literally picture the marketing weirdos at the meeting going off like this.

      • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
        0·
        5 hours ago

        The “a” is the worst part for me. You can’t see those little stubbs at a distance. So it reads JoGuor at a distance. They didn’t just fail to create a good logo, they failed to preserve the name. One bit of advice I always give is “imagine this logo on the back of a golf card or a Pride brochure. If the logo isn’t crisp and readable in black and white in a 1/2 inch square then it sucks.” This design fails that test. Not just because of the messed up “a” but the wide spacing makes those unreadable "a"s even smaller than if the letters weren’t so widely spaced.

    • nepenthes@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      7 hours ago

      It doesn’t say “car” at all either; no elegance or prestige. It looks like a logo for bottled water or something.

        • nepenthes@lemmy.worldEnglish
          0·
          5 hours ago

          Ya, I wanted to use a bland spy but there aren’t any-- I was going to use the Spy vs Spy guys because they are the most generic-looking, but ultimately I kept Powers because while he is stylish and fun, he is also really immature and the logo looks immature to me.

  • mister_flibble@lemm.ee
    0·
    11 hours ago

    I fucking hate this minimalist design trend more than it is probably reasonable to hate an aesthetic. It’s got the personality of unfinished drywall.

    • droporain@lemmynsfw.com
      0·
      7 hours ago

      The younger generation barely reads let alone reads cursive. This is next generation marketing you aren’t the audience I imagine.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      0·
      9 hours ago

      Honestly I think unfinished drywall has more personality. It’s utilitarian and rough around the edges, without the shiny surface veneer.

      That new Jaguar logo is like somebody took a beautiful old house full of exposed brick and wood work and put a coating of white paint over everything.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    0·
    14 hours ago

    I love how the new logo could be literally done in less than a minute on fucking microsoft office. They didn’t even bother with a cool looking font, just generic curvy shit

    • Bezier@suppo.fi
      0·
      10 hours ago

      I’m sure they spent an unreasonable amount of time getting that ugly font look just right.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      0·
      14 hours ago

      Better:

      • Revolut (though a fintech company named after a revolution lacking the charge at the end is still moronic in several ways)
      • airbnb (from awful to meh)
      • Spotify (same)

      Worse:

      • Pinterest (original fit the platform and what it is/was pretty much perfectly. Current is meh)
      • eBay (both are bad IMO, but at least the original was bad in a playful and eye-catching way. The new one is just more meh
      • Burberry (the stag was notable and signalled a history of old-fashioned quality that’s suitably rugged. The new one is meh AND insecure about people knowing which London they’re from)
      • Rimova (yet another fashion brand apparently afraid of being noticed
      • DF (from one of the best and most fashion-appropriate logos to an absolute eyesore and kerning nightmare that invites vandalism)
      • Jaguar (From absolutely iconic and great in every way to even uglier than the new DF one. I hope whomever came up with that got both fired and beaten and I’m a pacifist.)

      The rest just go from meh to slightly different meh 🤷

    • Electric@lemmy.world
      0·
      14 hours ago

      Those old fashion logos are actually sick. Concerning that an industry that sells style would make these their logos.