No examples from me, just curious.

    • Alice@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      I see this opinion a lot. Sincere question, how are countries without armies supposed to defend themselves from imperialism?

        • ulterno@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          enought military funding

          as much as can keep you more powerful than the rest of the competition combined.

              • Sas [she/her]@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                17 hours ago

                My aim for CIV is minimal military to survive a first push but enough money to just buy military units to then push back, take all their cities and be labelled warmonger. Suddenly everyone wants a piece of this ass so i spend the rest of the game fighting… I see I have a problem in this pipeline

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Pretty simple actually.
        Just make sure you don’t have any resource worth anything in the international market.

        1. Let stuff like petroleum, Lithium, Uranium and other such thingies be sold to the first bidder.
        2. Have your soil be nuclear contaminated, down to the bedrock, so nobody wants your land.
        • Also, import all nuclear waste from other countries
        1. Have a population that looks as ugly as possible, so noone will want to rape your people.
        • Should be easier considering point 2
        • Something like leprosy in the genitals would help too.
        1. Be absolutely full of population, such that the place is a cesspool.

        Hey, I said it’d be simple, not that it would be easy or even humanly possible.

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    in the cases that i could think of; i was arguing with people who wanted to remain willfully ignorant and refused to hear any sort of reasoning that contradicted their views, so it was a matter of accepting that i can’t force people to educate themselves because the information i was sharing was easily verifiable fact.