I know I have small hands but c’mon. Flagship phones these days are strait up small tablets, not even what we’d have called on phablets 15 years ago.

I know it’s what people buy, but I’m still sad that if I want a phone that small then I have to deal with camera and display a couple gens old

  • jdnewmil@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    As you add more compute per user interaction (“smart” features), you increase power consumption. To keep an 18hour discharge cycle, you have to have more battery. Since phone thickness is a negative marketing feature but increased screen size is a positive marketing feature, you end up with bigger phones.

    Every time they reduce compute power consumption, feature inflation overtakes the gain and more power is needed over time. Try turning on battery saver in the morning… even with “normal” use the battery will last significantly longer due to disabling background power consumption.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I would vomit if I had to look at the Windows logo every time I pulled out my phone. Google is not perfect and they’ve made mistakes with Android, but at least it’s Open Source. Microsoft has a much worse record of opposing Open Source initiatives…

      • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        This was nearly 20 years ago, Microsoft was annoying but fairly benign at the time. This phone with Windows Mobile 6 was released alongside the first release of android and the first iPhone

        • Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          You’re right, they haven’t been this overt since the 2000’s. But their flagship OS is still closed-source and forces ads and unpopular privacy violating features like Recall to this day…

  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Flagship means the best of the best, of course it’s gonna be large and fancy lmfao.

    There’s plenty of phones that fit your niche, but it’s like expecting a cigar boat to be the flagship of the navy dude lol. Gotta temper yourself to realistic expectations, especially when the term “flagship” is thrown out.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        So you don’t want a flagship, you want a small compact phone with all the fixings. That would no longer be the flagship anymore by using established conventions.

        Flagship has specific meanings and you’re ignoring them to bitch and moan.

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      This makes no sense. Large doesn’t mean fancy. Back in the day, making the phone smaller was fancy.

      The minimal company’s flagship phone is a minimal phone. It’s their signature phone. The flagship was the ship that had the ranking officer/admiral on it, representing the fleet. Apple, google etc all decided their flagship phone would be huge.

      OP wants more flagship phones, that is the type of phone the company markets as its main phone, to be smaller. It has little to do with the best but how phones are used. So tell him “tough luck because most people use their phones as a TV so they will remain big”. It’s not because that’s a better phone.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        This makes no sense. Large doesn’t mean fancy. Back in the day, making the phone smaller was fancy.

        Which has nothing to do with the the historical term and already established convention of the term “flagship”, no one has ever called their compact phone a flagship, got any proof to back that asinine claim up?

        The minimal company’s flagship phone is a minimal phone. It’s their signature phone. The flagship was the ship that had the ranking officer/admiral on it, representing the fleet. Apple, google etc all decided their flagship phone would be huge.

        If it’s not the fanciest and most expensive, then by definition and original convention, it’s no longer a flagship phone.

        Terms have specific uses, let’s not dilute them to make ourselves feel better. Language IS fluid, but when people are obstinate to already preestablished conventions… a small phone will never by definition eve be considered a flagship, but bloviate if you want.

        • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          Terms have specific uses, let’s not dilute them to make ourselves feel better. Language IS fluid, but when people are obstinate to already preestablished conventions

          Ok there why didn’t you bother opening a dictionary or googling it.

          noun

          the ship in a fleet which carries the commanding admiral.

          the best or most important thing owned or produced by a particular organization.

          He’s just saying most phones companies (of all sizes) making are big phones. Get over yourself

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            More specifically, it’s typically the vessel the admiral commands from, not just their one he happens to be on.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            So the smallest and worst ship would be the flagship? That’s the defence? Lmfao because that makes total sense dude…. And how is that supposed to defend what a flagship is?

            How does that mean the smallest and most compact? As my original comment stated, that’s like claiming a cigar boat is the flagship, which no navy would do even if they were making smaller boats. Their largest and fanciest, would STILL be the flagship of the fleet….

            I “did read a dictionary”, which is maybe why I’m speaking? OP fucked up what a flagship is meant to be. Atleast I’m not the one making up new definitions to defend my asinine defence. How does the definition support your argument? It would STILL mean the best and most resourceful unit. Which wouldn’t be the smallest……

            the finest, largest, or most important one of a group of things (such as products, stores, etc.)  —often used before another noun

            Other definitions include “largest” why did you include the one that doesn’t…?

            is the lead ship in a fleet of vessels, typically the first, largest, fastest, most heavily armed, or best known.

            Which how is that the smallest and most compact…? That’s literally contradicting the established conventions dude lmfao. But again, bloviate about how you don’t understand language and want to make it what you want I guess…. Flagship has established conventions, and OP is asking for the opposite. Full stop.

              • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.caOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                13 days ago

                He is wrong.

                I’m asking for small flagships.
                They used to make small flagships.

                Flagship doesn’t mean biggest, it means best.

                If settle for a small non-flagship phone with a flagship camera pod and display tech. But they don’t make those either.

                • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 days ago

                  They used to make small flagships.

                  When??? You keep saying that, but flagships have always been large and fancy and never small and fancy. Can you provide an example? Because what it seems from every explanation you’ve made in this thread, you just don’t know what the term flagship means…

                  Sounds like you just need to learn words properly, the only one wrong here is you using an established term incorrectly and are conflating a small phone as a “flagship” which has NEVER been the case. Please provide an example of a flagship being small and compact, I would love to see how you came to fuck this well established term up so horrendously.

            • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              Each fleet has its flagship lol all companies have flagships. Yes the best phone of each company is their flagship. Flagship phones isn’t limited to some arbitrary sized companies.

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                13 days ago

                And no phone manufacturer has ever called their small phones their flagships, so for to OP to say they miss them, is them not actually knowing what the term is.

                Can you provide an example of a phone that fits OPs definition as being sold as a “flagship”? Because OPs arguing for something that’s never been done before.

                Flagships CAN be small, but it’s never been done in history before, still waiting for an example, I’ve asked twice now. Because OPs barking up the wrong tree. That’s the issue here.

                You’re making this argument, while not providing anything to support it, I’ve even asked for a source to prove your point, all you’ve done is provide a definition that i then provided multiple that directly contradict the one you provided.

                Flagship phones isn’t limited to some arbitrary sized companies.

                In the history of the term, it’s never been a cigar boat dude…. It’s always the largest and fanciest, not the smallest and fanciest. Prove it dude. Step up or fuck off.

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                13 days ago

                Does “fit in your hand” not mean small and compact?

                I’m not the one using the term flagship to mean a non flagship phone. You’re trying to change established definitions and conventions.

                You want a fancy small phone, no phone manufacturer has ever called a phone that fits that description as a “flagship” so to say you miss the. Is just straight up bullshit and you being an idiot and not using established definitions correctly.

                • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.caOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Not only is that laughably not true

                  But even if it was true, it wouldn’t mean anything because being a flagship phone isn’t about size, it’s about showing off your tech.

                  But like I said, I don’t have to get hypothetical, because phones this big weren’t considered flagships in the past, they were considered “notes” and “tabs”

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Not that it’s everyday practical, but you can definitely get small phones. There are definitely lesser known names out there that make phones in all sizes.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Why would you buy a flagship phone? It sounds like you want not that. And not that exists.

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Because, like I said in the post, flagship phones have the best cameras, and I take a lot of pictures

      Image sensor and optics quality drop off pretty quickly once you leave flagship territory.

  • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I have the same problem and my latest was an asus zenfone after a ton of research. Its been pretty solid actually.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Zenfone was heavily promoted as a “small” phone but its larger than the base galaxy, despite having a smaller display

  • kaidenshi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Unihertz specializes in small phones. They aren’t flagship spec but they are midrange at sensible prices. They also have keyboard phones and even a phone with a built in DMR radio for Amateur and GMRS use.

    Not a plug, I don’t even own one I just love that they are daring to be different.

    • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Chinese company and the phones use Mediatek chips, so no custom ROM support last I checked. Otherwise I would have been all over it.

  • shneancy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    every time i “upgrade” my phone it gets bigger, i hate it. the perfect size was what whatever iPhone 5 was doing, i want to go back to that

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Companies trying to make foldable phones happen are going the wrong way.

    They are making giant phones that unfold into tablets when really they should be making small phones that unfold into something just large enough you can watch Netflix on.

      • MotorCade93@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        It literally fits in the palm of your hand and you can use it as a fully functioning device while closed, what do you mean?

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          I didn’t realize you had access to all the same features and cameras while closed.

          Can I get that, but without unfolding? I didn’t need it to unfold, I just want it to be small

    • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      I love the idea of foldable phones but I cannot trust myself with something so fragile. I can hardly even take care of a traditional phone.

      I’m lucky the Pixel 6 is as easy to repair as it is I’m on my third screen in like 2 years. Though I do kinda wish I did the 6a since it’s smaller.

    • tahoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I loved the idea of these foldable phones until I saw a Z Flip in real life, and it’s so damn huge when open, feels really uncomfortable to use. Was pretty disappointed :(

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Even that’s too big.

      That’s a pixel 7 pro on the left, which is only a little bigger than the 7a. I want something way smaller

  • nafri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    consumers in general wants bigger phone, market follow along

    sadly, small phone is a niche now

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      There’s more to it than that. Big phones are more marketable and have better profit margins. It’s not all consumer preference. Kinda similar to cars actually