• BlazarNGC@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m just saying you better be hot fire with that spear. Otherwise you’re getting cut.

    • dwindling7373@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Absolutely not. It’s the other way around there’s a reason any army get spears while swords are just a simbol for nobility.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I always find it fascinating the kind of things people will say because they saw a YouTube video once while ignoring all the actual historical context, like the Romans building their empire by fighting spear phalanxes with sword (and javelin) based legions.

        • dwindling7373@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          I’m not an expert, are you? All the in dephts historical weapon stuff I met in my life has told me and confirmed me spears win against swords.

          • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            I didn’t say spears didn’t win against swords.

            Spears are easier to wield, it’s a pointy stick. It requires less training to use. Requires significantly less materials to make.

            They are a standoff weapon though, in close combat a sword or small bladed weapon wins. Different tools for different purposes.

            The information I’m parroting is from experts and historians and literature and everything I’ve read over my 4 decades, it’s common knowledge at this point and not really worth “arguing” imo.