I for one am going through quite a culture shock. I always assumed the nature of FOSS software made it immune to be confined within the policies of nations; I guess if one day the government of USA starts to think that its a security concers for china to use and contribute to core opensource software created by its citizens or based in their boundaries, they might strongarm FOSS communities and projects to make their software exclude them in someway or worse declare GPL software a threat to national security.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    I’m out of the loop, what’s the recent Linux drama? If you don’t wanna type it out, you can point me in the right direction. Thanks. :)

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        For additional context, this was not a choice, but a requirement. The Linux Foundation is US based, and Torvalds is a US citizen. This was required due to current US sanctions against Russia, and was not just some sort of “Russia bad” thing from Torvalds that a lot of people are framing it as.

        • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          this was not a choice, but a requirement

          It has been framed as such, but no evidence has been given that it was a requirement

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    Yes. There is an extremely arbitrary distinction made between the USA and Russia. Both are known for injecting spyware. China is somehow still okay? It makes no sense.

    Not to mention the elephant in the room by not banning another certain country actively committing war crimes.

    All software should be safety checked. Where the maintainer is from should be irrelevant.

    But the most weird aspect is the timing. Why now and not a few years ago?

    • troed@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      There is an extremely arbitrary distinction made between the USA and Russia.

      Your world view seems to be highly influenced by propaganda. It’s very easy to draw a distinction between these two countries. Let me start with an easy one:

      Russia is a dictatorship, the US is a democracy.

          • Binette@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago
            1. You’re replying to someone from db0

            2. Lemmy.ml is not the only place that believes the US isn’t a democracy.

            3. The US is an oligarchy. It’s one of the things agreed by philosophers, including my teacher. The current controversy in the left surrounding the elections obviously proves this point.

            • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago
              1. Oops. That’s… interesting.
              2. Maybe, but we at least get to select which oligarchs we prefer. In Russia, you select from Putin, Pootin, and Puteen.
                • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  I’m not saying the system works or rises to the level of good. I’m saying that it is much better than the Russian system. The people at least get to choose who they think they want, and which group of people will be whipped more.

  • Scorpius [He/Him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Same here. For now it’s only barring contributors which won’t harm actual users much, but that could change in the future with the precedent this is setting.

    What’s the point of “FOSS” at that point if it’s not so different from corporate products, being similarly vulnerable to sanctions? I could see genuine free software being relegated to piracy communities if it goes that far.