• jumperalex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yup, that’s reasonable too.

    But like, that makes it a lumpy salary and not a bonus if it’s an entitlement without a reasonable low floor. Are there union contracts that actually dictate it like that?

    Setting aside for a moment the understandable and reasonable belief that owners will try to fuck labor, a mandated cost divorced from the broader company financial performance metrics, sounds like a way to ensure bankruptcy. Even without this tariff nonsense there are real and honest cases where costs can skyrocket and a company has to adjust and that really does can little to nothing for the bonus pool (or other labor cost) without incurring a lot of financial risk.

    Again, not an argument against unions, 100% support organized labor, but at some point math is math.

    • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes and, labor unions have foregone bonuses in moments like that. The working class has had to pry those bonuses back.

      I don’t think contracts are as rigid as most people would imagine. Especially if the rank and file vote not to collect on the bonus.

      The math do be mathing though.