• Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    They don’t need to buy a year of stuff. They need to buy American. It’ll be more expensive, but people should not be cheap. We’re not appliances and Chinese people also aren’t appliances.

    • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Who’s going to pay for all the expensive American stuff? Nobody, because they already barely afford the cheap Chinese stuff.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Well that’s because the money is going to China instead of back to Americans.

        • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          I mean, that sounds pretty reasonable. But can you list any countries with isolationist economic policy that are more prosperous than America? I can’t. How do you account for the loss of inflow of foreign money into America after America stops spending money elsewhere? You can’t.

          • Mango@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            Well that inflow is from what we’re selling, right? Not buying.

            Also, Denmark? They seem alright. Correct me if I’m wrong about their policy.

            • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              Denmark just happens to have strong social programs, significantly better than the US has ever had. Free education, healthcare, employment benefits, and wealth distribution through taxes. Not comparable at all.