• 0 Posts
  • 50 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle





  • A better question to start would be if there’s any creative commons or copyleft media in the modern zeitgeist.

    Memes are made organically as small units of culture and gain popularity via an implicit understanding of meaning that doesn’t need to be explained.

    For a meme template to have those attributes, it would need to derive from a work that was licensed as CC/copyleft from the get-go and gained popularity among the masses.

    That being said, seems a moot point when fair use/derivative work standards allow unlicensed memes to legally exist regardless of the original licensing of the work they were derived from.


  • Having run out of my previous set of late night easy viewing media, I recently started watching The Next Generation. Was surprised to discover it is actually a fun show (even the supposedly terrible first season), provided you enjoy the veneer of mild campiness inherent to television of the 80’s-90’s.

    The show is also giving me hope that societal progress can never be stopped, since people were able to imagine this sort of reality in much more restrictive times than we have today. I just hope they’re wrong about World War 3 beginning in 2026 🥲


  • For work in the public domain, that’s one thing, but for work which is still copyright protected, you can actually be sued for (shockingly enough) making copies of it.

    Generally, though, most countries only care if you distribute copies of something (even if you’re not making money off of it), but that’s not to say that the concept of “distributing” hasn’t been stretched pretty thin in the past.

    Rightsholders have gone after businesses and private individuals just for playing sports events on radio or TV audibly/visibly enough to have an “audience”, thereby infringing on broadcast rights. Even if they’re not charging a thing for it. Feel free to read this and see how far the insanity goes.

    If I buy a book and make copies of the pages to takes notes on, that’s usually fine. But if I make a copy and give it to a friend…



  • Stovetop@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlSpyingOS
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Depends on how one frames it. It’s not the Stallman-defined “GNU+Linux” pureblood OS, but it nevertheless is built from a modified version of the Linux kernel.

    And like any OS it can be made private and secure with the right components…or it can be cracked open like a data-farming egg without them.

    I guess I can just take the low-hanging fruit and invoke Ubuntu as an alternative example, which was once something of a Linux entry point but has become more than fine collecting user data.




  • That doesn’t seem to apply to what you quoted, however. The section you quoted framed sex as a transactional obligation on the part of women, asserting that if women refuse to sleep with men who support their views and rights, they’ll become radicalized and turn into incels.

    The logic in that statement is that men who care about women are entitled to a bit of quid pro quo, “I support your rights as a person and you have sex with me” even though that is entirely antithetical to the point.

    If men care about women’s issues, then they are inherently fine with women making a conscious decision to not have sex. Otherwise, it means they don’t really care about women’s issues, and likely never did.

    No one is shaming women for choosing to have sex with people they want to have sex with, just that the decision of those women who wish to stop having sex be respected.


  • Stovetop@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneepic ratio rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    No, I think the reply is appropriate enough. The comment you quoted is an extremely mysogynist take, falling right into the incel perspective of “if women refuse to have sex with men, they are inconsiderate.”

    The value of women is not just for men to have sex with them—they have the agency to decide for themselves what they want to do with their own bodies. This is basically what the downvoted post is saying. Women choosing not to put out doesn’t “radicalize” incels any more than women showing a bit of skin creates rapists.

    If there are men who can’t get over the fact that some women might choose not to have sex with them for political reasons, they can read Lysistrata or something.






  • Caught me before I was able to edit! I thought about it for a second and decided that estimate was too high.

    10 people is what I would usually say is a normal amount, maybe variable depending on how hungry people arrive and if there are any other dishes to snack on at whatever hypothetical party this is.

    I can only eat 3-4 slices at most before I get full, but my appetite isn’t the biggest.

    Usually what ends up happening is that I still order a party pizza for a group of 5 or so people and then end up with leftovers for a few days. Just can’t beat the surface-to-crust ratio.