• 0 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 11th, 2023

help-circle
  • It’s a reference to 1 man 1 jar, a shock video that went viral about years ago.

    Essentially, it shows a naked man squatting on a jar, which slides all the way up his ass. The jar then shatters, and the rest of the video is him trying to pull the glass shards out while clearly losing a lot of blood.

    Feel free to seek it out if you are curious, but be aware you will see exactly what I described.



  • I actually haven’t listened to any other Zappa albums, but probably will at some point.

    I love the titular track, so I was excited to listen to the whole thing, but I think I found it 30 years too late. I get he was trying to go Reefer Madness style with his Central Scrutinizer telling a parable of how rock music leads to self-destruction, but the jokes just fell flat for me.

    Obviously the nice girl who ended up having to do wet t-shirt contests to get home, the gay prison sex, the robot sex, saying Africans don’t have record players, etc. were all supposed to be absurd, but it’s very 70s humor that nowadays feels more denigrating than biting satire. I also didn’t really get him corpsing in the voiceovers: I’m guessing it was supposed to be a reminder not to take the story seriously, but I personally found it distracting.

    I did find it cool that he mixed solos from his live shows into his songs, but it wasn’t enough to save it for me. It’s like when you go back and watch older movies or tv shows, and suddenly something just blatantly racist or sexist just pops up and immediately dates it way more than the technical aspects do.

    In short, it feels like Zappa is trying way too hard to be edgy, and it sucked the life out of the album for me. The opening song still slaps, though.







  • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.eetoScience Memes@mander.xyzTiny pp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Problem is that this legitimizes their belief that there are set characteristics that define people as “manly.”

    Every 30 years or so we make some sort of social progress for women and/or LGBT people, and then a panic ensues that society is trying to destroy manliness. The Joe Rogans and Andrew Tates of the world suddenly pop up and start selling their nonsense that will magically make them the man’s men that their grandfathers were (while in fact their grandfathers were being told the same thing.)

    The solution to this isn’t to tell the loud whiners that their exact fears are true. It’s to divorce ourselves from the notion that being a man is determined by penis/testicle size, or even by having them at all. By telling the bigots that their worst fears are true, we’re tacitly endorsing their bigotry as legitimate, when we should be doing the exact opposite of that.



  • Problem is on some calculators C is clear all and CE is clear entry, on some C is clear entry and AC is clear all, and some have a C/AC or CE/C button where it’s press once to clear entry and press twice to clear all.

    So it’s safest to mash unless you really know your calculator, because the industry can’t get its shit together, and that’s the sole reason it died (I’m assuming.)