Yay! You found your crayon!!! Was it between your mom’s couch cushions?

Whether there is a legal justification depends on a jury. Sorry you don’t like it but it’s how the law works. I suggest you try to learn about the things you have opinions on.

I’ll say it slow (I would use crayon if that was an option here). You are making a legal determination. The law in the USA recognizes the right of the jury to decide whether something was justified or not.

If my opinion of you effects how you feel about your humanity I suggest therapy and touching some grass

You are missing the point. Murder is a legal term with a specific meaning. By using it here, before the legal process has even started, you demonstrate a bias in favor of the capital class. Even in your response the CEO “caused deaths” but the individual committed a “murder.”

Language matters. Adopting the language of the capitalist class (assuming you are not a part of that class) is what makes you a bootlicker.

Murder is the unlawful killing of another human without justification or valid excuse committed with the necessary intention as defined by the law in a specific jurisdiction.

Justification is a defense in a criminal case, by which a defendant who committed the acts asserts that because what they did meets certain legal standards, they are not criminally culpable for the acts which would otherwise be criminal.

NYS Penal Law SECTION 35.15 Justification; use of physical force in defense of a person

Whether or not he is a murderer depends on whether the DA can meet their burden of proving he committed the acts necessary to satisfy the elements of NYS definition of whatever degree of murder the Grand Jury indicts (if that happens) AND he is not able to establish the affirmative defense of justification.

None of these determinations have been made yet.

I gotta ask, are you a time traveler or a boot licker?

Will do. And thanks for the reminder. It’s always good to “stay ready and keep your powder dry.”

What’s wrong with publicly naming and shaming? The other side of the coin is that pushing policies that shortened the lives those they agreed to insure is “going a little hard” for capitalism.

Just because there are more steps between a board vote and a flatline than there is between a firing pin and a brainpan doesn’t make one act legitimate and the other criminal.

(ps you are obviously on our side, but we refuse to cede an inch of the societal gains made by the recent grassroots corp restructuring)

Optimistic to think he and his was on the same plan as us and ours.

Trolly problem. Pre-meditated murder is justified when it stops premeditated murders