• mathias_freire@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I didn’t say there is not proper healthcare. I said couples might not be able to access it. Either it’s banned or it’s expensive. Also it’s not about abortion though. Couples might have just wanted to have sex but might have kept the baby, doesn’t matter. It’s not always “let’s have a baby”.

      • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Abortion is part of proper healthcare. As is affordability. If that’s not there, then that’s a lack of proper healthcare

        • mathias_freire@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          I don’t think the main point of this discussion is how to define “proper healthcare”. Humans do not always think “let’s have a baby and grow our family”. No, they mostly just have sex and keep the baby in case of pregnancy, sometimes involuntarily.

          • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Having the tools to abort pregnancy, prevent it, and know what you’re doing is part of good healthcare. If this really is a major problem somewhere, then that place does not have proper healthcare available.

            There are plenty of countries where this is already the case, most of them in Europe.

            • mathias_freire@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 days ago

              Yes, we can continue to discuss about accessibility of abortion tools but that is not my point. Couples or individuals may still decide to keep the baby after pregnancy happened, even though they did not plan for it or they don’t have enough money to raise a kid. They just have sex and baby comes a surprise. This happens a lot more than you could imagine.