Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 days agoPro-tip for this capitalistic hellscapeslrpnk.netexternal-linkmessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkPro-tip for this capitalistic hellscapeslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 days agomessage-square78fedilink
minus-squarejrs100000@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 days agoYou could just raise chickens at the point.
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-211 days agoCrickets are cheaper/more efficient.
minus-squareCorkyskog@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoBut you can do both, if your cricket operation really gets going you can use them to feed the chickens.
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoFeeding destruents to a destruent? Two times the loss; crickets/chicken was supposed to save food money, not waste it.
You could just raise chickens at the point.
Crickets are cheaper/more efficient.
But you can do both, if your cricket operation really gets going you can use them to feed the chickens.
Feeding destruents to a destruent? Two times the loss; crickets/chicken was supposed to save food money, not waste it.