If you think this post would be better suited in a different community, please let me know.

Topics could include (this list is not intending to be exhaustive — if you think something is relevant, then please don’t hesitate to share it):

  • Moderation
  • Handling of illegal content
  • Server structure (system requirements, configs, layouts, etc.)
  • Community transparency/communication
  • Server maintenance (updates, scaling, etc.)
Cross-posts
  1. https://sh.itjust.works/post/27913098
  • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    10 days ago

    It comes down to the individual company on whether or not to fight requests for user information. A lot of precedent exists for not complying.

    • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.worksOPEnglish
      0·
      10 days ago

      It comes down to the individual company on whether or not to fight requests for user information.

      Wouldn’t this simply be obstruction of justice?

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        0·
        10 days ago

        NY Times vs Njalla

        Njalla does comply with some requests, and was forced to shut down some pirate bay instances at one point, though. Ghost is another privacy domain seller.

        Theres also a term for companies called “Bulletproof Registrars.” For example, some Malaysian Registrars apparently don’t have an address and cannot actually recieve most subpoenas.

        Mostly VPNs, I don’t know too much about similar cases with server hosts or domain sellers.