• umbraroze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      The way publishing industry has been for a very long time, authors (especially first time ones) don’t get to pick whoever pays the best deal. Just whoever pays the first.

      Edit: Also, theoretically, publishers should accommodate author wishes once a publication contract has been made. Actually not unheard of that a publisher would do something cool for their up and coming star. But this? Sloppiness on the publisher’s part, plain and simple.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The author doesn’t get to pick who can print his book? Or do you mean he has no real choice because he’s got bills to pay?

        • umbraroze@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Authors have to submit manuscripts to publishers individually (or, in some markets, agents who work with multiple publishers in the same niche).

          Publishers get showered with manuscripts. Very small percentage of them are what publishers deem will meet market goals.

          In standard publishing contracts, the author gets paid an advance. This is basically the royalty percentage for the entire first print run. It’s not refundable. It represents the trust the publisher puts on the author, and if the publisher can’t sell all copies, well, tough for them. (They’d probably just not work with that author again.)

          Getting to that point is a pretty massive hurdle to clear for first time authors.

          So no, authors don’t really get to pick their publishers. The only scenario where people get to pick their publishers is some celebrity deal bullshit.