• sunnie@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Using better by itself is fine in an informal context, and “had better” is only required for formal contexts. And I don’t think a meme on the internet counts as a formal context.

      And also, 🤓☝️

      • OfCourseNot@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’d be a contraction of ‘would’ in this case, wouldn’t it? As an ESL speaker I used to find these grammar ‘mistakes’ (for lack of a better word) made more difficult for me to parse the sentences. As with code ‘written once but read many times’ would apply here.

        • sparkle@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          For a lot of English speakers, the “had” and “have” in contractions is completely omitted in certain contexts. It’s more prevalent in some dialects (I’m in the south US and it’s more common than not). Usually “had” is dropped more than “have”.

          Also, English can drop the pronoun, article, and even copula for certain indicative statements. I think it’s specifically for observations, especially when the context is clear.

          looking at someone’s bracelet “Cool bracelet.” [That’s a]

          wakes upsigh Gotta get up and go to work…” [I’ve]

          “Ain’t no day for picking tomatoes like a Saturday.” [There]

          “No war but class war!” [There’s]

          “Forecast came in on the radio. Says there’s gonna be a hell of a lot of rain today.” [It said -> Says/Said]

          “Can’t count the number of Brits I’ve killed. Guess I’m just allergic to beans on toast.” [I; I]

          “House came tumblin’ down after the sinkhole opened up” [The]

          “I’d” can be “I would”, mainly if used with a conditional or certain conjunctions/contrastive statements (if, but, however, unfortunately). Also when preceding “have” – e.g. “I’d have done that”. Because “I had have” doesn’t make sense, nor does “I had <present tense>” anything. “I’d” as in “I had” is followed by a past participle.

          “I’d” is usually “I had” otherwise, forming the past perfect tense. But in “I’d better”, it’s a bit confusing because “had better” is used in a different sense – the “had” here comes from “have to” (as in “to be necessary to”) and can be treated as both a lexical verb and an auxiliary verb. “had better” is a bit of a leftover of more archaic constructions.