"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agoControversial questionlemmy.worldimagemessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageControversial questionlemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square108fedilink
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoI would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
minus-squarechuckleslord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoCool definition. Still not a majority.
I would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
Cool definition. Still not a majority.