TLDR: i complain about samsung’s flagship and newer android.

I use samsung flagship phone and it’s crazy, how unable I am to use full potential of my phone, just because I don’t want to log in to google neither to samsung. I try to use F-droid and Aurora Store whenever possible, but its so bad experience…for maps I use Organic Maps, but google forces it to be installed specifically from Google Play Store to work with Android Auto, so I have to log in every time there is an update. Most of games won’t work, because they require being signed-in to google, and thats actually kinda weird…before my phone now I had an old Galaxy S5 Android 6.0 and games there didn’t complain that much as here on Android 14 (so the newer android the less privacy you get, while them all companies “focus on privacy”, bullshit liars), samsung requires signing-in to usd like 1/10 of the flagship features…It’s so sad, as I love samsung’s quality, phone is really outstanding, overall all samsung products are very good quality, but pushing these fucking accounts is convincing me not to buy samsung’s flagship anymore. We need to finally unite and make some alternative to those close-sourced bloatware, as phone industry is nowhere near to being as free as desktop industry. I feel more free using Windoze than those fucking " smart"phones. Really if you have to buy new smartphone and are into privacy, think twice before you buy samsung…phone itself is great, but software side is a nightmare.

  • Blender Dumbass@lm.madiator.cloudEnglish
    0·
    3 days ago

    I bought a phone for something like $20 which is very simple. It has no vibration. It has 65 KB of onboard storage. And it is not a smartphone. I don’t even take it with me most of the time, because I know that nobody will call me anyway, so why bother. I use it very rarely. The most usage I have from it is calling, flashlight and maybe as a clock once every so often, since I have many actual clocks.

    On the computer I use GNU / Linux. And I have no complaints.

    So I don’t understand why even bother with a smartphone in the first place?

    PS: I would love to try Pinephone or Librem5 though.

  • bokherif@lemmy.world
    0·
    3 days ago

    You can’t really expect to have any privacy if you’re using any online service anymore, so I just stopped trying. Blasting a Samsung phone with all the features enabled and not thinking of going back really.

    • XTL@sopuli.xyz
      0·
      3 days ago

      One of the worst names ever. Maybe also one of the worst launchers. Otherwise I really like it.

    • codenul@lemmy.ml
      0·
      3 days ago

      I really like /e/os and have been running them for almost 2 years now. But recently they are having infrastructure issues and I may be moving on from the project. Sucks since i am a paying customer (online ecosystem) of them

  • Anna@lemmy.ml
    0·
    4 days ago

    I used to use Lineage OS before without gapps and it worked flawlessly although it was few years ago. Give it a try.

    • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
      0·
      4 days ago

      If you liked LineageOS without gapps, than I highly recommend DivestOS. It is a soft-fork of LineageOS with significant security hardening and removal of proprietary binary blobs.

      • Tundra@lemmy.ml
        0·
        3 days ago

        Ive been meaning to flash this onto my fairphone but the websites instructions are a bit confusing (I’ve installed calyx, eos and graphene on other phones)

          • kixik@lemmy.ml
            0·
            3 days ago

            That’s great if not having to use any proprietary apps depending on google services, including push notifications, since part of divestos unsupported stuff includes:

            Google Apps or microG or Sandboxed Play Services are NOT supported.

            Which is fine, if you don’t need to use such apps. An alternative to /e/os, which now a days is actually murenaOS, is lineageOS for micro G, which does sort of monthly releases based on whatever is available as nightly releases on lineageOS. It does provide you with microG and also with F-Droid with privileged extensions installed and already set for you. This might be more suitable than divestos if in need for some such apps.

            • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
              0·
              2 days ago

              MicroG actually works on DivestOS. It is “unsupported”, as-in the Dev doesnt want to put any significant time into development for Gapps support.

              • kixik@lemmy.ml
                0·
                2 days ago

                True, but not entirely, signature spoofing needs OS support, and LOS and divestOS don’t, whereas murenaOS (/e/OS) and lineageOS for microG do. Other than that microG’s own f-droid repo makes it easy to keep microG’s component up to date.

                That’s why I mentioned it would be nice to upstream divestOS bootloader lock/unlock at will solution, so that not just LOS, but derivative ROMs can inherit that solution. As some people don’t like the tight integration from murena (/e/) with all of its rebranding, LOS for microG is a very appealing option, if wanting full microG’s support. Actually LOS for microG was there quite before /e/ was created.

      • potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fishEnglish
        0·
        4 days ago

        lets start the divestos wave, its somehow rarely heard of but has the support of lineageos with the hardening of (almost) grapheneos, and the principles of GNU.

  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    0·
    4 days ago

    Lineage and a fork, DivestOS are very close to Graphene, and run on far more devices.

    The search for perfection is the enemy of good.

    I’ve run Lineage for years on some spare devices. Battery life is so much better without Google Services.

    My most recent device (Pixel 5 with DivestOS) is averaging 1.1% battery consumption per hour over the last day. That included an hour of navigation, using Google maps with microG services.

    One old device runs longer with DivestOS than it ever did with stock, and the battery has lost 40% capacity. That’s how bad Google Services eat battery.

    Plus Lineage permits you to use a number of old devices, unlike Graphene. It’s good, it gives you far more control than Google.

    My final thought on Graphene - it needs to be taken over and lead by some professionals. Those folks act like stereotypical geeks of 30 years ago, arrogant, condescending (I worked with their type 30nyears ago, and was a little like them then). They also denigrate anything less than what they deem “perfect”. The very definition of hubris.

    Their attitude is “if you have a problem you must’ve done something wrong, why did you do something wrong”. Having that experience with them has put me off Graphene permanently.

    Edit: I can re-lock the bootloader with Divest, so the condescending Graphene folks are just plain wrong about being the only OS that can do this.

    • kixik@lemmy.ml
      0·
      3 days ago

      Yup, divestOS allows for booloader lock though unfortunately they don’t support microG. I hope they somehow help upstream their relock solution to LOS. I use LOS for microG instead, since I need stupid bank apps and also for the office some stupid proprietary multi factor authentication apps… If only LOS for microG could lock the bootloader at will (it needs to be unlocked for major upgrades, like on regular LOS), that’d be great.

      There’s as well CalyxOS, which uses microG and also locks the bootloader, however I do prefer LOS since the strategy from CalyxOS and GrapheneOS trying to deGoogle pure Android in my mind sound like having some limitations, as opposed to LOS approach to be based on AOSP instead. Though that’s just in my mind, I’m sure those guys in Calyx and Graphene are the best at security and privacy.

  • Tinkerer@lemmy.ca
    0·
    4 days ago

    This is why I specifically pick phones that have custom ROM support. Then I don’t need to install gapps and I just use fdroid

  • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.orgEnglish
    0·
    4 days ago

    to respond to the title, I’m not sure about that. your problems are with the samsung system, not with all the custom roms. I think it’s not only graphene that’s the solution. It’s even only available for a little subset of the phones.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    0·
    4 days ago

    As someone who’s used android literally since the first android phone was released, it’s a massive disappointment how locked down and enshittified it’s become.

    • Umbrias@beehaw.org
      0·
      4 days ago

      or want a pixel, or want to buy a new phone. the insistence on pixel support only is frustrating.

    • djsaskdja@reddthat.comEnglish
      0·
      4 days ago

      I got a refurbished Pixel 7A for $220 just to mess around with GrapheneOS. It’s a very affordable phone.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      0·
      4 days ago

      I’ve bought used phones since 2013. The most I’ve ever paid is $150, and that was recently for a Pixel.

      You can pickup a Pixel 4 for about $100.

      Surely “most people” are paying far more for their phones.

        • JustARegularNerd@aussie.zoneEnglish
          0·
          3 days ago

          Genuine question because I’ve been out of the loop on this. I had a Galaxy S5 that only got one major upgrade from Samsung (4.4 to 5.x I believe) but CyanogenMod and later LineageOS took that thing right up to Android 11.

          Why can’t the same be done with modern phones today? What changed between that old S5 and the Pixel 4a I ultimately sold for going EOL on GrapheneOS?

          Edit: apparently I shouldn’t compare apples to oranges without so much as quickly checking support for the Pixel 4a…

          • j4k3@lemmy.worldEnglish
            0·
            3 days ago

            The kernel started moving faster, but also the kernel for these devices are orphans. They can never be updated properly because the source code for the kernel modules is not available. The way the phones get updated in ROMs is by back porting changes from the present back to the old orphan. It requires someone super familiar with both kernels to do so. Eventually it becomes untenable. The whole scheme of Android is centered around this source code/orphan kernel scheme. Everything is setup so that hardware manufacturers never have to add their source to the mainline kernel meaning you can never own the device. There is not a single phone or mobile device that you can completely own and running on mainline with available source code. The pixel is all about the TPM chip.

    • zingo@sh.itjust.works
      0·
      4 days ago

      The biggest problem is the scarce availability outside the US.

      Or should I say, that the biggest problem is software (OS) compatibility with other devices than the Pixel?

      My money is on the latter.

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          0·
          4 days ago

          Rich?

          So only the half of the US that buys iPhone’s is rich?

          Or is it they don’t know what they’re paying because it’s part of the monthly bill?

          Most of the iPhone users I know are in their 20’s and make less than half of what I do… And I’m far from rich.

    • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
      0·
      4 days ago

      The a series is pretty good bang for your buck, if you can’t afford that and neither used ones, then maybe you could settle for one of the cheaper Asian ones supported by Divest OS

  • j4k3@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    4 days ago

    I am surprised it took you this long.

    The next step in this evolutionary thinking is simple. Buying hardware specs is a fool’s folly. I don’t compare hardware. Ads and marketing are totally nonsense and not worth even a slight glance. The ONLY thing that matters is what open source projects exist and what hardware do they support well. This is how I shop. Open Source or F.O.