O shit you were serious?? Thabks for misinterpreting my comment btw. Let me correct that for you.
sadly I have to take a comment justifying sexist generalizations on men because males have more privileges compared to most other groups seriously.
It’s not the part about men having more priviledges that people are having issues with, it’s the part that THAT somehow excuses being sexist against men.
Damn, Poe’s Law hittin this comment hard, and I can’t tell from the instance either.
Non exaggerated non explicit comments without enough context deserve to be taken seriously. Sadly.
It seems that you nailed it.
O shit you were serious?? Thabks for misinterpreting my comment btw. Let me correct that for you.
It’s not the part about men having more priviledges that people are having issues with, it’s the part that THAT somehow excuses being sexist against men.
if males get disadvantaged, they’re getting closer to the same level as everyone else, thus increasing egality
By disadvantaged, do you mean removal of privilege or wanton sexism? Because the latter is the point the others want to clear up.
The words you use are good, but the context is bad.
So your solution to ending sexism is more sexism?
that’s realistically more achievable than the other way around