• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    You really don’t understand how expensive underground cables are. You know those big, huge steel transmission towers that you see lined up, hundreds in a row?

    Those towers costs hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars each. And the reason they’re used is because that’s way cheaper than underground.

    Shit - just the cable is a couple million per mile per cable.

    • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Are you fucking serious? Nuclear power plants cost way fucking more than some cables. You people are fundamentally so unserious. Pull your head out of a reactor for ten seconds and take reality as it exists

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yes. They cost more than some cables. But we aren’t talking about wiring a stereo.

        A new nuclear unit (4 billion-ish) costs about as much as 2,000 miles of transmission-grade cable (about 2 million per mile). Considering that there’s about 30 cables on a tower run, you’re looking at around 65 miles’ worth of cable for the cost of a nuclear unit.

        And that’s just the cost of the wire. No towers, no conduit, no substations, no land acquisition (aerial easement and underground are very different things), no labor.

      • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        mmmm sounds like someone has zero concept of the scale of the problem: ie how much cable we’d need to bury. Simmer down Tony Snark, you’re demonstrably less clever than the rest of the species’ experts in this.