• TimeNaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Then Arch is kind of a terrible choice for you. I use it btw, but I’ve been using linux since 2008.

    The learning curve and constant need to troubleshoot things isn’t great for beginners.

    • TommySoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s one of the reasons I chose arch. Because of the difficulty i can’t take shortcuts or be lazy and have to actually learn. When I tried something like Pop_OS I definitely enjoyed it but didn’t really learn anything because it was all done for me.

      • cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Arch Linux can be a bit overwhelming for newbies when trying out for the first time. Hey if you are comfortable with it then so be it. But if you have tried other friendly distros before this you can get an understanding of different package managers, arch packages, AUR etc. And to answer the question if you installed KDE through pacman or AUR helper, then it will be updated automatically when you update other packages through it.

    • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      What are y’all doing that you need to troubleshoot constantly? My experience with arch is about the same as my experience with Debian.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I had way more struggle and frustration using mint/ubuntu than arch/endevourOS/openSuse TW

      🤷🏻‍♀️

      Using old kernel and mix of flatpak/repo/snap etc. Is just unpredictable, what happens and why. At least for me.

      I love, how in arch anything is verbose! Main reason I love linux and Arch especially.