• SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Finally, a use for Magic cards

    Actually, one place I know uses them as coasters, and another has a tabletop made out of them covered in resin, so I guess this is the third useful thing

    • Archpawn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think an awesome way to use them would be to have the BBEG be a planeswalker. When the fight starts, the DM pulls out a Magic deck and starts playing Magic against D&D.

  • scaramobo@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I know Black Lotus is one of the most (the most) valuable MTG card, but why is that so?

    It’s a nice card, but not all that extremely powerful or special, is it? Was it just super rare? It’s from one of the first series, I believe?

    • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      /u/DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca is right on the money. Mana paces the game, so anything that can break that is super good. In an otherwise even matchup, if one player has a Lotus while the other doesn’t, that can easily make the game. It’s not going to win the game in and of itself, but it’s a huge enabler to play the thing that will win you the game, before your opponent can reasonably do anything about it.

      On top of that, it’s literally good in all decks. It’s been banned in every format besides Vintage, where it’s restricted to one (and not including casual/fan formats). It had to be banned partly for power reasons, but also because it makes deck-building less diverse. There’s no deck that wouldn’t want a Lotus if it could have one, much less four.

      It’s also part of the Reserved List. After WotC overprinted cards, they essentially promised not to reprint certain ones. I think it’s a dumb decision, but they’ve annoyingly stuck to it (and players are worse off for it). Black Lotus is on that list. And it was alreadly limited in printings, because it was a rare card, and a bit of a design mistake.

      It’s also simply an iconic card. Despite being a design mistake, it’s a major part of Magic history, and gets referenced all the time. To some extent, it’s famous for being famous. That makes it the biggest prize for collectors.

      So, all this together, it has an incredibly high demand, a very limited supply, and no indication of a reprint anytime soon.

      So I printed off a proxy at a professional card printer for 30¢. :)

      • sundray@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        After WotC overprinted cards, they essentially promised not to reprint certain ones. I think it’s a dumb decision, but they’ve annoyingly stuck to it

        WotC goes out of its way to avoid upsetting the used market/card arbitrage people. If they did a reprint of Black Lotus, the howl of anger from those folks would shake the Earth from its orbit.

    • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      10K at the low end.

      If it makes you feel any better, the wood grain in the hole doesn’t line up with the wood grain of the rest of the table. It’s a slightly sloppy photoshop.

        • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You can also tell by zooming in and looking at the focus/detail/resolution difference between the card’s art and the wood of the table along the edge of the cut-away hole. That slightly jarring difference of resolution is a dead giveaway for a photoshop.

          • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Come on, that’s literally just JPEG artefacting because it’s a meme and it’s been shared a bunch. There are so many fakes of this card out there, it’s not that far-fetched and it’s likely not a $10k+ card that was destroyed.

    • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Which is probably why that’s the one they chose for this picture; it being a counterfeit and not an original, of course