• Ferrous@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    Couldn’t think of a more lemmy thread topic than one involving both Russian geopolitics and linux.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    “Compliance requirements”? The kernel’s american now?! WTF?

    The commonality of all these maintainers being dropped? They appear to all be Russian or associated with Russia. Most of them with .ru email addresses.

    Not short-sighted in the least…

    Similarly, the driver code remains within the kernel – including for Russian hardware such as around the Baikal CPUs from Russia’s Baikal Electronics.

    Not a hypocrite move at all…

    Are israeli developers blocked as well? How about all american developers considering how the US foreign policy keeps fucking everyone up all over the place in the name of liberty and freedom… of oil?

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      You do realize that the Linux foundation is an American based entity right? It isn’t a shock that it is bound by US law.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    Hello Internet commenters. Please remember that there’s no rule that says you need to tell us all your gut reaction to this if you know absolutely nothing about the situation.

  • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    Dude, WHAT. This is totally against what Linux and Open source in general stand for.

    I don’t support the thing that I’m sure was their reason for this but I definitely don’t support banning someone from contributing to an open system solely off nationality.

    So what eventually only the “good guys” can contribute to and use open source software? Who exactly decides who the “good guys” are in this scenario? USA? China?

    The implications of what this can cause in the future for potentially all of the open source community is absolutely sad. We should welcome all our fellow human beings to contributing to open source.

    • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Yeah, being from Russia is a lot different from being associated with the Russian government. If the maintainers are in the latter, then yeah fuck em, but if they live in Russia with no realistic way of getting out and they’re just trying to live a normal life removed from the bullshit and write code as an intellectual escape? And you take that away from them? Precisely how you radicalize people

      • 0x0@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Yeah, being from Russia is a lot different from being associated with the Russian government.

        Lies! You’re a communist! Russian troll!

        /s for the obtuse

  • nanook@friendica.eskimo.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    This is a shame, I always thought Linux was supposed to be an International collaboration, hate to see it caught up in this bullshit political agenda.

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      Does invading your neighbor count as international collaboration? Not that all Russian people can be held directly responsible for the actions of their government.

      • nanook@friendica.eskimo.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        @theunknownmuncher The US has been involved in probably 300 regime changes throughout the world, has invaded many countries, including those that we were not affiliated with. Russia invades a neighboring country when we install a leader that is going to allow us to put missiles on their border. I really hate to see political hegemony get in the way of a good collaborative effort, we all suffer for it if we allow this.

        • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          The US has been involved in probably 300 regime changes throughout the world, has invaded many countries, including those that we were not affiliated with.

          Absolutely fair point. I agree with you on this portion of your comment.

          • nanook@friendica.eskimo.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            30 days ago

            @theunknownmuncher And I could give countless other examples of other countries. I don’t agree with the war, but I also know if we hadn’t installed Zelenskyy and if the United States had honored our promise to Russia not to extend NATO past East Germany, then it would not have happened. So I understand that it is hardly one sided on Russias part. If we didn’t fund Ukraine, if we didn’t offer them membership in NATO, none of this would have happened. And I’ll add if the Ukraine and Russia did not have large oil reserves and some other precious minerals, the United States would be a lot less interested in them. But that’s all in the past. Now, you and I can disagree with each other and we can disagree with what our governments do, but if we want to build a better world it has to happen through the cooperative efforts of citizens NOT governments because the latter just historically a lot less likely to happen. So I can’t see this move as at all productive towards ending this particular war or world peace in general, I see it as quite the opposite.