• cmhe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    These radio telescopes don’t transmit anything at all, they listen to radio waves coming from the cosmos. Much like a normal telescope doesn’t transmit light.

    If you invert the flow of the electrons, a receiver becomes a transmitter.

    Speakers can become bad microphones and vice versa. Pretty sure that a radio telescope is a very bad transmitter for human music, but it could be possible with some changes…

    • stevestevesteve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      if you invert the flow of electrons, a receiver becomes a transmitter

      Ehh not really. That’s kind of like saying if you invert the flow of photons, your eyes work as flashlights.

      “It could be possible with some changes” the changes would amount to removing the receiver and replacing it with a transmitter. In this specific case I’m not sure if a transmitter already exists at this antenna and it’s definitely possible one does, but that’s not a guarantee at all

      • cmhe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        There is no such big differences between a light emitting (LED) and a light receiving diode (photodiode), they are just the reverse of each other. In fact photodiodes can even emit light, but very inefficiently. Same in reverse, LEDs can also detect light, just badly.

        It seems like most efficient energy conversion methods can be used in both directions.

        • Strykker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          Yes, but you would blow out most of the amplification circuitry in a radio telescope reciver if you tried to use it for broadcast at any kind of power.