• curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Only at idle.

    At peak the sff PCs are going to be at least triple the ~30W of the pi 5.

    Edit: You’ll get way more out of the sff though, which is what I was saying. Tiny/mini/micro is my entire self hosted environment (as well as lab and work setup for the most part).

    • peregus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      At peak the sff PCs are going to be at least triple the ~30W of the pi 5.

      Are you sure? I think that for the same tasks, the i5 (at least 9th gen) is more power efficient than the rpi 5. I was a pi guy, I had them all over the places, but like you, I’m now using SFF/tiny used PCs (when I don’t need GPIO).

      • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        At least as far as my setup, yeah. Ive got 5th-10th gens, under high loads I’ll see a spike to 80+ watts, the highest is 170W but those have nvidia quadros in them.

        Edit: For gpio now I’ll just use an esp32 or something instead.

        My only pi usage these days is work stuff, and orangepi is supported there. In terms of arm, also Jetson, but that’s kind of outside the discussion here.

        • peregus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Ok, but is that “high load” something that the rpi 5 is capable of handling? I don’t think so.

          • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            I’d even say equivalent load - but again, I dont support the foundation, wouldn’t buy a 5 in the first place.

            I’d still say you’re better off with a t/m/m even with a few watts of savings.