AwesomeLowlander

Sadly, no. About 0.5% of our brain mass is microplastics.

https://pirg.org/articles/new-research-finds-plastic-in-human-brains/

Unless they’re maintaining the software themselves, there’s no such thing as perfectly loyal. In the past the revolutionaries needed to capture the armory, now they need to capture / subvert the servers / programmers.

Wait, they let him live a year? Damn

Edit: No, he was alive for 3 weeks.

It was the actual author, who got annoyed that people couldn’t recognise satire. Not much different from today, in other words 😂

Just a note, it is actually so offensive to a woman’s role in society that many (most? I have no idea) scholars think that it was so over-the-top that it must have been meant as a critique of the then-status-quo.

The author outright stated that it was meant as a critique in the 2nd edition, so there’s no need to guess :)

It’s not like there’s a single standard way to spell it

This is one joke I didn’t get, and still don’t. Anybody care to explain?

You’re thinking of ‘rm -fr /’, easy mistake

MFW I hook up a Factorio spaghetti section to inputs and it works the first time.

Let me introduce you to ‘rm -rf /’, and variants thereof

A hundred years supply, probably more, at the current market rate, is not enough of a reserve? Also, the cost of uranium is not the major cost of nuclear power. It’s barely even a drop in the bucket.

Oh gee, that’s your best argument right now? Usage of caps? Lmao

Oh this is hilarious how badly you’re misunderstanding your own source. This is akin to ‘peak oil’ 30 years ago. The reserves listed in the article are about how much known reserves are capable of supplying AT FIXED MARKET RATES OF $130 - $230 / KG.

Some choice quotes from YOUR linked source:

Further exploration and higher prices will certainly, on the basis of present geological knowledge, yield further resources as present ones are used up.

An orebody is, by definition, an occurrence of mineralization from which the metal is economically recoverable. Orebodies, and thus measured resources – the amount known to be economically recoverable from orebodies – are therefore relative to both costs of extraction and market prices. For example, at present neither the oceans nor any granites are orebodies, but conceivably either could become so if prices were to rise sufficiently. At ten times the current price*, seawater, for example, might become a potential source of vast amounts of uranium. Thus, any predictions of the future availability of any mineral, including uranium, which are based on current cost and price data, as well as current geological knowledge, are likely to prove extremely conservative.

They even SPECIFICALLY addressed your concern!

Of course the resources of the earth are indeed finite, but three observations need to be made: first, the limits of the supply of resources are so far away that the truism has no practical meaning. Second, many of the resources concerned are either renewable or recyclable (energy minerals and zinc are the main exceptions, though the recycling potential of many materials is limited in practice by the energy and other costs involved). Third, available reserves of ‘non-renewable’ resources are constantly being renewed, mostly faster than they are used.

Did you just try to google and link the first result or something? HALF THE ARTICLE IS SPECIFICALLY ABOUT HOW WE HISTORICALLY KEEP TALKING ABOUT RESOURCES RUNNING DRY, AND WHY THAT ENTIRE IDEA IS NONSENSE.

1. No

2. Because #1 is no

Ten lines of text would cover all your AI-generated porn needs

Hint, you should be sad more often.

Bonus panel:

Maybe someday there’ll be a show based on the comic! They could make it an animated series!

Hotel wallpaper

ITT: OP just wants to vent, now he literally has homework instead.