• whats_all_this_then@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Disclaimer: Only Trek I had watched beforehand was Lower Decks (loved it) and SNW (loved it) in that order. With that said, here are my opinions nobody asked for:

    • S1 had its flaws but I was there for dark, depressing, and moody.
    • SNW cast carried the fuck out of S2 and the plot was good too imo.
    • First half of S3 was promising…but they fucked it up so utterly and completely in the second half that it was hard to take the rest of the show seriously afterwards.
    spoiler

    SPOILER START
    They COMPLETELY lost me with the source of the burn, it was one of the dumbest things I’ve seen in a hot minute.

    They had me again with the Giorgio redemption stuff in S4(?), but it was all downhill from there.

    SPOILER END

    I had to forward through starting from the second half of Season 4 just to get through it. It got so ridiculously boring. I was hoping it’d get better and I could watch normally again but it just didn’t.

    Watching TNG now and I’m loving it. Can be a bit slow sometimes but still enjoyable.

    Edit: Does boost not do spoiler tags?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Re your spoiler:

      spoiler

      I agree. Out of all the reasons they could have come up with for The Burn being caused by a distraught Kelpian was one that was mostly just designed for an emotional ending rather than basic decent sci-fi.

      That was really an issue with Discovery for me overall, they wanted to do the ‘tug your heartstrings’ before doing anything else. There needs to be a balance for me.

      I do like that Seasons 3 and 4, for all of their flaws (and 4 had massive flaws), tried to do their best to undo the darkness of the first season by restoring Starfleet and the Federation in the far future.