• Maddier1993@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    People who come here to say Linux is not good or that this community is an echo chamber and get mad for pointing out obvious flaws in the OS miss two things:

    1. The post is an opinion of someone. Notice the “I” in the title? That should give you some clue.

    2. You are offended when people suggest that you learn and adapt to the OS, but you suggest that Linux should support your workflow without any effort on your part to learn the OS. Which is hypocritical to say the least.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’ve been planning to switch my PCs at home to Linux as a winter project this year.

    I just installed a new SSD and put Mint on the main newer machine yesterday. Nary a speed bump in the process, and it’s so nice to have the snappy desktop and update experiences I’m used to from running Linux all day at work.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Let me give you 2 big reasons:

    1. Linux does not work with the particular hardware or software you want or need to use.
    2. It’s a PITA to just do basic stuff.
    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago
      1. It’s a PITA to just do basic stuff.

      In my experience basic stuff like browsing files, editing documents, launching apps, installing apps, and obviously a million things using a web browser, are all easy and snappy in a fresh out of the box install of Linux Mint.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That’s cool. That’s not been my experience at all. Nor has it many many other people. It’s like the number 1 complaint, and the number of delusional people who try to pretend like it doesn’t exist is insane.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 hours ago

            It’s a PITA because there are a dozen different installation methods, and if anything at all is not functioning perfectly, the only advice you’ll get is typing random commands into the terminal that report back some generic error that you have no idea what to do with.

            • Custodian1623@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 hours ago

              i dont mean this in a judgemental way but that sounds like you dont understand or just dislike the process and conflate that with difficulty. the commands aren’t random, you just don’t know them. people who have learned how to use the OS (granted, not everyone has the time for that) generally know what commands do before they paste them in. I have a much easier time running a single command rather than navigating through layers of GUI but not everyone will share that preference

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                that sounds like you dont understand or just dislike the process and conflate that with difficulty

                LOL and what exactly else would you call that? They’re random to me. I don’t know them, I don’t want to know them, I just want it to work like every other sensible OS where I can figure out how to complete basic tasks without needing a computer science degree. That’s what most people want and it’s why Linux will remain a niche OS by nerds and for nerds, because that’s the way they like it, which is fine, but let’s not try to gaslight people into believing there’s no reason people might want something else.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Point 2 is wrong. It’s very easy to basic stuff. I’d argue it’s easier than Windows, which is a convoluted mess. You’re just used to it being shit.

      Point 1, maybe. The fact you just keep repeating “particular hardware or software that does not work” without actually giving an example shows you’re talking out of your ass though. Sure, there are a few cases, but not many anymore. Most, if not all, of those cases can be handled by a VM though.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        The fact you just keep repeating “particular hardware or software that does not work” without actually giving an example shows you’re talking out of your ass though

        LOL I love it when people get offended because someone disagrees with them and then try to put forward their experience as if it’s a fact. I didn’t repeat anything. I said it literally 1 time. You expect me to sit here and list the dozens of hardware configurations that I’ve personally used that have conflicts with Linux? Hell anything with an Nvidia GPU (which is the vast majority of GPUs in existence) is an exercise in software engineering just to get it functional.

      • hellofriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I can’t agree with you tbh. It depends on the distro. On Windows I can basically one-click install OpenMW and it Just Works™. I can’t even play it on my distro because for whatever reason it’s broken. I ended up having to flat out purge it and install the daily build to get it working. Maybe it works better on other distros, idk. Worked fine until my distro updated some months ago. When I was still running Lubuntu I had to build it from source to get it to work.

        This is the nature of open source and decentralized platforms. And there’s nothing wrong with that. But if anyone expects the mainstream to adopt it when ease of use has been the name of the game for the last 20 years then they’re mistaken. As good as Linux has gotten, there are still kinks that need worked out before the average user will adopt it. One step towards that is government adoption. This will almost certainly lay out a stable baseline standard that can be built off of for a more coherent experience. I can see Linux competing with Windows provided it comes up to par on UX.

        • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Having an app store is easier than expecting people to download things from the internet, just because your distro fucked up doesn’t mean this isn’t generally a win for linux.

          i work IT, software fails to install ALL THE TIME on windows for all kinds of reasons

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 hours ago

          You keep implying Windows has ease-of-use on its side. That is just blatantly not true. I don’t know a Windows user that hasn’t had to edit registries, for example, and that’s a pain in the ass. Windows is just a piece of shit that people stepped in so long ago they stopped smelling it. They don’t pay attention to how bad it is to work with because “that’s just the way it is.” The one benefit is the software mentioned above (with just a vague notion of “some software” when the vast majority is fine), though again most work with a VM if Wine isn’t enough. Support is an issue of getting users there though. If people keep assuming that what you’re saying is true they’ll believe you and not try it. If they switch the software developers will start targeting Linux.

          Playing old games is also often really painful on Windows, and requires a lot of hacks. On Linux I’ve had a very good time with that honestly. Maybe I’ve just gotten lucky, but Wine with Proton has made the experience with old games pretty easy.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I don’t know a Windows user that hasn’t had to edit registries, for example

            You’re experiencing more delusions. 99.9% of Windows users wouldn’t even know what that is.

            (with just a vague notion of “some software” when the vast majority is fine)

            Again you’re asking me to write out what is a list a mile long. I’m not doing that.

            I will give you one example though. I went to download GrayJay yesterday. I got the file. I have no idea what to do with it. Because there are a dozen types of files for Linux and all of them have to be installed differently. I got a folder. I know from years of experience how to install .deb, .rpm, flatpak and appimages, this folder has 398457 files in it and none of them are those. That’s not even getting into how a lot of Linux software, you’re expected to know how to compile the fuckin thing yourself…

            You know how to install programs on windows? You download the .exe, double click the file and it installs itself, every time.

            You know how to install programs on Mac? You click download on the .dmg, double click the downloaded file and it installs itself, every time.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 hours ago

              It looks like GrayJay only has an android application, with a desktop one in testing. I’m assuming you have to compile that yourself because it’s in testing. You aren’t supposed to be using it if you can’t compile it from source. Just run the android one in an emulator if you need it on desktop. That’s the same thing you’ll need to do on Windows.

              You know how to install programs on windows? You download the .exe, double click the file and it installs itself, every time.

              Yeah… You have to go to their website, hope it’s the real one, download the .exe and install it. Then to update it you have to do the same thing. On Linux you just tell your package manager to install it and then you’re done forever. It’ll keep it updated and you never have to think about it. The fact Windows apps are required to check online for updates and then you have to open it in a browser and download and install it yourself is the most garbage experience. You’re just used to it.

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 hours ago

                I’m assuming you have to compile that yourself because it’s in testing

                Weird, you don’t have to compile the Windows or Mac versions…? 🤷‍♂️

                hope it’s the real one

                …why wouldn’t it be the “real one” on their website?

                The fact Windows apps are required to check online for updates and then you have to open it in a browser and download and install it yourself is the most garbage experience. You’re just used to it.

                …no, they update themselves? Have you just never used anything other than Linux? It’s hard to imagine how you would not know this unless you hadn’t.

                It’ll keep it updated and you never have to think about it.

                Other than the pop-ups telling you you need to update every 5 minutes?

                • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  From their FAQ: “Do you have a desktop version? A desktop version is actively in the works, and already in internal testing phases.”

                  It looks like you can download the pre-built applications for all of them though, including Linux. You probably just need to use chmod to let your system know it’s allowed to execute it.

          • hellofriend@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Sampling bias. The people you know are likely more technologically inclined than the average user. Really, effectively anyone who uses Linux is simply due to the nature of the thing. To people like you and me, the average user is a literal idiot. And that’s something we forget. The average user doesn’t ever have to finagle with registries and probably doesn’t even know they exist. Hell, they probably don’t even know how to change their default browser from Edge. And don’t get me wrong, Windows is a piece of shit. But it’s undeniable that its standardized protocols and coherent ecosystem make it easier for the average person. I do concede that this is due in part to software developers targeting Windows primarily, but I don’t see a world where Linux is used by the masses unless some distro sees adoption and standardization by some larger body.

            As for old games, if I played Morrowind via Steam it would work fine but the reason I play OpenMW is because it modernizes the engine. 1080p isn’t even possible in vanilla. 100% improvement imo, but it causes me problems on occasion.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I said this in another thread but I set up a windows vm for someone because they needed it to run literally one scam tax software, otherwise they had no reason to switch back from Linux.

    Even stuff like icue that uses windows drivers for peripherals will run in a VM with USB pass through.

    And even then there’s a nice open source alternative for icue; you only need it if you want to edit hardware profiles.

    • esa@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      US? Here in scandi tax seems to work well automatically, as in, we just log into the government website and click OK most years. Corrections are easy enough too, if you need it, but it’s usually not required.

  • dev_null@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    My reason is that VR gaming is not feasible on Linux, so I need to keep a Windows VM to play VR games.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Most VR headsets don’t work at all on Linux, and for those that do, most games don’t work anyway. For those that do work, they are unstable, and SteamVR itself is unstable and prone to crashes. Even when things work for a while, the frame rate is lower than on Windows, which is much more important for VR games.

        So as much as flat games work perfectly on Linux nowadays, it’s just not there for VR.

            • Custodian1623@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 hours ago

              amd gpu, have tried quest and index. quest takes some work but index doesnt have issues. performance might be better on windows but I wouldnt know

              • rehydrate5503@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Nice, thanks. I’m on nvidia. I was thinking about the quest simply because it is so much more affordable, and newer than the index. Only thing holding me back is I don’t have a meta account nor do I want to make one, even if it’s just for the quest.

  • alekwithak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    My daughter wants to play Sims 3 and use her Zune. I’m sure it’s possible to do both with enough work and time spent tracking down old utilities but how much time do I want to spend on that when I could just crank out a VM.

      • alekwithak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It’s funny to me that I could even tell which post of mine this was a response to 😅

        Yes, we are quite anachronistic in my house.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I’m surprised that Zunes even work anymore. I thought that Microsoft had that locked down so tight that it wouldn’t work without the Zune software on your PC (which likely hasn’t been updated since 2012).

          • alekwithak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            I have multiple 120GB Zunes, one being my original and the others I bought for cheap when everyone was dumping them for their phones. They all work fine. You do have to track down the software; I keep the executable on my local file share. I just found my old brown 30GB Zune in storage. It has a bunch of local bands from the area I grew up in that are irreplaceable. Unfortunately the software can’t read it because the firmware is out of date, and it can’t be updated without wiping the music off it, which defeats the purpose. There’s a utility called zalternator that allows you to mount the zune as a disk but I haven’t been able to find a copy anywhere. I was going to make a Windows XP VM and install the 1.1 version of the Zune software and see if that works. I digress, they do work still, but it’s a bit of work. MS could have brought it all back after GotG3 and cashed in, but nope!

  • “Anymore”? I haven’t ever owned a Windows machine, and I haven’t used a Windows machine since 2015. I do have to fix a random issue on my wife’s work laptop about once a month.

    I get that there are some things some people can’t do without and which keeps them in Windows: games, and requirements of their business (Word, Excel, PPT), but nothing about Linux has gotten significantly better in recent years. Incrementally, over there past decade, sure, but no big, recent change that might justify the title.

    Except in the same way I’ve never needed Windows: in a very specific, individual way.

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Coming from someone who just migrated myself and my family within the last year. Flatpaks were a big deal. I get people have their criticisms of it but wow, installing and updating apps is so much easier now compared to when I tried linux last and flatpak is probably the main reason why we are still on Linux today.

      • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        As a person who was all in on the AppImage distribution system (vs Flatpaks), I’m both sad and excited to see how well Flatpaks seem to be working out.

        I guess they won that little competition in the end - which seems good, as there’s now a healthy standard we can focus on.

        It’s genuinely great to now have widely accepted distribution independent packaging standards.

        • I’m glad Flatpack appears to be winning over the utterly horrible Snap, but I still don’t like it. I fear a day when it becomes difficult to get software that isn’t packaged in Flatpack, and I have good reason to: Ruby Gems. Long ago, I was big into Ruby, and was a major contributor (I authored one of the core standard libraries). Gems came along, and I hated them; eventually, for unrelated reasons, I stopped using Ruby altogether, and now when I encounter it, it’s impossible to use anything that doesn’t have Gem woven into it. Consequently, AFAIK, my current system has nothing Ruby installed on it - unless my OS package manager is doing it under the hood.

          IMHO, Flatpacks are a really poor work-around for people supporting and using programming languages that don’t build software correctly. Rust and Go do it right: they build stand-alone executables. Flatpack adds literally no value to software built with these. They’re not the only languages that do this, but they’re the ones having their moment; any language that builds stand-alone, statically linked binaries would do.

          I’m with you about AppImage; it would have been a better solution. Any packaging solution requiring extra software to be installed and a service to use is a bad design. I’d be objecting less if AppImage were emerging as the winner.

          Incidentally, this is why Podman is superior to Docker: yes, you still need extra software to be installed, but there’s no system service with crazy, root-level permissions required to run containers with podman.

  • Alphamars@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I can’t afford a broken system anytime and that’s why i can’t use linux. It breaks when you least expect.

    • sgibson5150@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Try Silverblue or Kinoite. They’re designed such that if you find an update breaks something, you can literally revert to the version before that update with a reboot. Application distribution through flatpaks offers pre-configured environments so it’s not a pain to get stuff running. Toolbox lets you dick around in isolation from the system. You’d really have to go out of your way to break something. Great stuff.

      • hellofriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The only thing I ever had consistently break on me on Windows was the search indexing running constantly and eating up all my resources. Easy enough to turn that off, but then you can’t search files. I switched because I don’t like corpos. Just curious what happened with your system to make you ditch it.

    • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      My son was literally crying earlier today because his VR headset is no longer visible from Windows and all of his efforts to fix it (driver updates, tweaking various program settings, and so on) failed.

      So… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        A perfect example of what windows stans are blind to. That you will literally always have trouble on windows doing most things (at some point), and depending on what software you use and other factors, windows might be more problematic for you than even running a rolling release that might break any time. That’s the case for me. Also, running the less stable releases is absolutely a choice. Other more stable releases probably break far less often than windows.

    • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      In my experience Windows takes way more troubleshooting and time debugging and fixing things than linux does. Theres a reason people use linux for critical servers, it tends to be extremely reliable once everything is set up.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Not to mention is is very easy to automate. You can deploy thousands of servers with a button and delete them all if you want.

    • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Funnily enough I could say the same about Windows

      That thing has broken itself more times than I can count but my 2 linux machines (I still have 1 Windows machine) have been rock solid for 2 years now

      The most only reason I have the last Windows machine is because I’ve been lazy about switching it lol

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why is this thread getting flooded with people saying how they can’t use Linux? Isn’t that a little odd coming from a Linux community?

    • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I don’t see why. You can be interested in Linux and like some aspects of it but still get annoyed at the blinkered zealots claiming that there’s no reason to use Windows.

    • Strykker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because on lemmy a post getting 100 up votes is enough to end up somewhere high on all, so your seeing people from outside of the Linux community in here.

      • Coriza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I would say “people don’t see the community a post is in before commenting?” But of course they don’t. :'(

        • meliaesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 hours ago

          People outside of the community are allowed to have a different experience than those within it.

          • Coriza@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Of course, but sometimes communities have a specific context that is important to be aware of. Just to give an extreme examples: Communities like unpopular opinion, that you should upvote if you do not agree with that opinion. Or circle jerks communities that the point is to be tongue and cheek about the particular subject. Or the nosleep community that, if am not mistaken the name, everyone has to interact with the post in character as if it was real.

            • meliaesc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 hours ago

              The title of this post is “I Don’t See a Reason to Switch to Windows from Linux Anymore in 2025”, surely that invites discussion?

              • Coriza@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                13 hours ago

                I read the combo before my original reply as “there is a bunch of people with no interest in Linux or that just hates Linux coming to a Linux community just to say that Linux sucks”. I feel like that if it was a more general technology sub it is fair, but in a Linux community is more weird, like people interested in Linux will discuss its shortcomings in a more positive way not just being dismissive. But I may be interpreting things wrong.

    • andioop@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Hiya, intending to switch from Windows to Linux (it looks like I’ll finally be pulling the proverbial trigger this holiday season!) but I got here via Local sorted by Active on programming.dev. I am not subbed to Linux.

      In other words, people outside the target audience are getting exposed to this post.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because people are mad any time someone suggests they could change anything about themselves. It’s pretty sad.

  • Thorry84@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve been using Linux on my personal desktop system since 1997 and I think it’s great. However as a user I fucking hate Linux so much. It is so frustrating to use, it always breaks in weird ways.

    It can do anything because you can configure so much and you can even go into the code and make thing your own. But at the same time it can’t do anything, there usually isn’t a basic framework to do what most people want. Each user is just supposed to figure it out for themselves and put their system together in a way that makes sense. Even someone like me who can understand all this crap and can read, understand and contribute to the code, doesn’t always want to do this. And most users wouldn’t be able to do it anyways. Let me just spend 12 hours of my own free time to figure out something that isn’t documented very well, with often wrong or outdated information, weird bugs with quirks and workaround and fun interactions with other bugs and workarounds I have on my system.

    Just the other day I raged my head off because some kind of update broke my shit. There is this protocol that allows for the OS to tell monitors what brightness they need to be on. This is awesome for tablet/convertibles/laptops/all-in-ones, but for desktop systems I don’t really see the use case. But it can’t hurt the feature is there and you choose not to use it right? However it turned out this latest update had a nasty bug in it. At boot it somehow set all my monitors to 100% brightness, which was highly unpleasant and kept resetting it to 100% every boot. Not only that, it turned out my main monitor had too much clever for its own good. It has two modes of operating, one mode where the builtin OS inside the monitor does everything, it handles all the settings, profiles, color shit, protocols etc. The other way of operating is where the OS inside the computer does everything, they have a driver for Windows and some neat software that allows you to do everything in there. It has game recognition software and tweaks the monitor to work perfectly with that game etc. However me being a Linux user, they ofcourse don’t have any of that, not even a driver etc. but I know this when I selected the monitor so I made sure it could handle everything inside the monitor as well, so I could use it to it’s full potential on Linux. But this update broke all of that, because the monitor saw the OS was telling it to go to a certain brightness setting, so it assumed the OS inside the computer would be running the show and reverted back to some default safe profile until the software utility could tell it what to do. This made my monitor borderline unusable and flash bang me every reboot (which was a lot of times whilst I was trying to figure out how to fix it).

    I put in a lot of hours and was able to somewhat consistently block the brightness control so the monitor could again be in charge. But not after the monitor was fed up with all my shit and just completely doing a factory reset, so I lost the personal profile I had been tweaking for years.

    Now I know the monitor probably shouldn’t work this way and it’s bullshit the manufacturer doesn’t create Linux drivers and makes sure the software utility is available on Linux. But on the other hand, this is just the way the world is. Blaming it on some huge corporation that doesn’t give a shit and runs on cost/benefit calculations doesn’t fix my monitor. In my experience this is a huge problem in the Linux community (me included), we tend to get mad at other entities that cause the problem as an excuse for not fixing said problem. Which is perfectly valid from a person point of view, but very frustrated from a user point of view.

    Most people who went through what I went through with my monitor wouldn’t be able to fix it and simply give up on using Linux forever. Or at least till they get a new monitor 5-10 years down the line.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      The self contradictions here are astounding. I love this thing that I hate. Now let me write 12 paragraphs about how much I hate to love to hate it

      • Thorry84@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Humans are pretty complex so what may seem like a self contradiction actually isn’t in fact.

        But I can hit you with another one for me personally: I fucking love a big juicy burger, especially with cheese, pineapple, lettuce and spicy sauce. However I am normally a vegetarian and try to restrict my meat consumption as much as reasonably possible. I’m not a full vegan, because that just seems like self torture without a lot of extra gains, but maybe I’ll become one in the future.

        And I can write you essays upon essays about how much I hate Windows and other Microsoft software. Even though it has a special place in my heart, because when I got my first computer in 1984, it ran Microsoft BASIC as its primary “OS”.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ok Grandpa let’s get you to bed

      In all seriousness you have a fair point. Linux does occasionally have weird bugs if you are using something closer to upstream. Fedora does a pretty hood job of catching most stuff but it misses some things. If you want a more stable experience you want something that’s for of a LTS such as Linux Mint or Debian.

        • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Debian WSL has been legit more stable for me than running it as the primary OS. Dunno what to tell you, because you can’t change my past experience with what I have been dealing with for the past two decades using Linux as my daily driver being a broke student.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Dealing with Linux for 2 decades doesn’t make you and expert in modern Linux. It just makes you old.

            Even leaving Linux for a few years means that you get behind. I had to explain to a coworker what Wayland was because he hasn’t used Linux in years.

            If WSL works for you that’s great but here are the issues I’ve had

            • weird networking issues where Windows can access Linux but Linux can not access Windows without lots of work.

            • any advanced networking like VPN’s will not work

            • It is slow and requires working virtualization

            • Filesystem sharing is not as easy as I would like

            • It is a bit finicky to get working and requires a bunch of disk space and resources.

            Meanwhile native Linux doesn’t have these issues and git bash/cygwin is almost native in the sense that it has little overhead. Architectural perspective Cygwin is a lot like Wine. It just translates Linux calls to Windows ones.

            If you need Windows I would run it in a VM under Linux as that’s going to be a much better experience.

            • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Without doxxing myself, I promise you I know more about linux than you do and I’m not saying windows is better, you silly fuck, I am saying it’s more stable. I don’t even recommend using either as a server when BSD is better at stability than both OS combined.

  • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    2025 year of the minutes desktop 🤣

    It’ll never happen because Linux zealots write this crap when 100% seriousness.

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago
    1. Web-based tools get the work done: agreed,especially when half of these web tools are Electron like number 5
    2. Plenty of distributions to suit your preference: my personal favorite thing about Linux
    3. Steam has a decent collection of Linux Games (& you may get a console): True,And outside of steam will work nicely aswell (like touhou 6 for example like Proton/soda does a great job of running touhou 6 patched with THCRAP)
    4. Proprietary choices on Linux (Better late than never): True and maybe even custom versions of wine (like elemental warriors fork and vanilla wine but vanilla wine cannot run complex apps tho)
    5. Technologies like Electron make it easier for app availability: Controversial opinion but True
    • haverholm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Technologies like Electron make it easier for app availability: Controversial opinion but True

      I do agree, but currently Electron is great for apps the way Flash was considered great for the web. It solves one problem, but creates a bunch more.

      In itself, Electron is pretty bloated*, but I don’t dare check how many versions I have installed because different apps have stuck with older ones. I’d really like to see a less resource consuming, backward compatible alternative to Electron.

      * From my thrifty perspective of keeping older hardware alive with Linux, that is. On your high grade, best-of-class gaming rig, mileage will definitely vary.

      • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s quite a storage hog having multiple 500+ MB electron blobs. Unfortunately that’s a platform agnostic issue now.

      • Mwa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        yeah true its spinning a instance of the Chromium browser which is where the bloat is at.

  • haverholm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Like most articles on itsfoss, this one is only a notch over clickbait — a kernel of an idea not fully developed, written with the last minute energy of a student who pushed off the assignment until right before deadline — but I’ll be damned if that title isn’t beautifully turned.

    I haven’t had to have Windows installed for more than a decade, but on recent occasion I’ve borrowed Windows and Mac computers for work. Those revisits didn’t give me reason to switch back, only to long for my lean Arch install.

    As the next major version of Windows approaches like a Santa down the chimney with all sorts of “AI”-infested gadgets in his sack, I do hope more will make the more often mentioned switch to a Linux distro from the advertising platform OS that came with their computer.

    But this headline deliciously reminds us that there is already a good chunk of users who made the jump, or are sitting on the dual booting fence, one boot (sorry!) on either side. This article is for them, yes, but also a gentle nudge for those still gathering courage.

    At this stage, it is time to seriously change the perspective of that switch. The single reason for switching from Windows to Linux is … the utter state of Windows. Only the most blinkered of tech journos can continue to pretend that all is well on Windows, and not at all a sophisticated malware infection.

    So bravo itsfoss for the clever barb, less so for the depth of the article itself.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I like the writing style of It’s Foss. They don’t make there articles dry and the tone is always positive and honest.

      I think the Linux switch will heavily depend on your work flow and whether you like to tinker at all. I think It’s Foss is write to say that for some Windows is not an option. People like me use a lot of Linux tools and apps.

      • haverholm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I agree that the tone of their articles helps push the quality above some other tech blogs. At the very least they’re sincere!

        Windows is no longer an option for me either — I had made a conscious effort to use FLOSS apps even before switching, so there wasn’t much holding me back. And, as you say, once I’d started modifying system settings to disable Microsoft telemetry, I was already at Linux tinkerer levels…